The Confirmation from the Epstein Files: "Genetic Code" is a Cypher for Bio-Electricity!
DNA Code can be decoded, because it has been encoded artificially to "DNA" in the first place ("natural cryptography"... of course...).
Do you remember when Yuval Harari proclaimed that we have “hacked the human being on a global scale”?
This article provides evidence and background information to support this proclamation, through the correspondences of Jeffrey Epstein over the years. He connected the top end of Neuroscience, Signals Intelligence and Psychopathy, towards the refinement of our daily nanoparticle-cocktails, that we thankfully inhale- whilst they are sprinkled all over the sky and into our food, medicine and water systems… (for better signals and the transduction of bio-electricity).
My favourite way to get rid of these materials is the pulsed nano-bucket (self built) with sodium citrate and sea salt (pulls out big amounts of particles and even fibers1 and you can see them with a strong flashlight… the particles only under the microscope of course- when you drink sodium citrate, you can also find them in your pee afterwards…). Apple cider vinegar or lemons + sodium bicarbonate is great and creates natural sodium citrate to drink. NAC was always great for me (clean sources are scarce though), everything that is negatively charged is beneficial against the inflammatory onslaught! Chlorella and Polyphenols are natural chelation agents!
(This is not medical advice of course).
Dr. Gerald Pollack’s confirmation of the fact that Genetics is EZ Water based Bio-Electricity Capturing and Influencing:
Genetics is a Cypher for Bio-Electricity! The Great Confirmation from the Epstein Files.
Genetics is a cypher for magneto- dielectric vortex motion:
Bio-electricity
The Evidence from the Epstein Files (Biology as a “Crypto System”).
Some emails as a starter:
Inside Epstein’s terminology: “Code-Breaking” and “Intercellular-Deception” means → “DNA Code” to Bio-Electricity (5g / 6g to biology and back).
related articles:
Greetings to you!
This is my personal favourite find so far! In the beginning of last year, I have been investigating the fraud around DNA and put out my theory that genetics could be a cypher for bioelectricity, in order to hide the fact that the access to our body is quite simple, once you apply A.I. pattern recognition to read and write our magneto- dielectric vortex signals that are governed by our bio-electricity all over our body. We have discussed the fact that we are liquid crystalline beings and that EZ water charge around hydrophilic surfaces (all water loving biological surfaces, charged by infrared light, coming from matter directly, or the sun…) animates everything in nature, our muscles as much as the clouds in the sky! The Epstein Files were a goldmine and the confirmation for my theory came in with flying colours: DNA is indeed being regarded as a cypher signal. Jeffrey uses the phrases “applied virology” and “pre-living viruses” that “need a programming language”2- so you can understand the way he is using these categorical deceptions around virology and healthcare to exploit us even harder! Just two years ago, this notion has been quite alienating, since the entire world has believed their genetic fairy tale for decades upon decades! What a time to be alive!
Not only was Epstein involved in bringing people together for that job (the encoding and decoding of bio-signals), his language reveals everything we need to know and more already, in order to confirm this idea (encryption, decryption, deception…)!
The coming paragraph is solely based on the results of the official Epstein Files, through the [Epstein Files Search]:
Jeffrey Epstein’s Unified Research Agenda:
Biology as an Encrypted Signals- System
(Encryption, Decryption & Deception)
Throughout a series of emails and messages spanning several years, Jeffrey Epstein articulated a singular, cohesive intellectual framework for understanding biological signals as naturally deceptive “crypto-warfare” (it could not be more blatantly obvious what that means… encoding and decoding of bio-signals, while the entire world has been distracted with impossible complexities around non existing CRISPR CAS9 & co instead… a categorical deception).
At its core was the conviction that biological systems- encompassing “DNA”, cellular signalling (actually EZ water charge driven, charged by infrared and other light), neuronal networks, evolutionary mechanisms, “viruses” (code word for nanoparticles), and even pathological processes like cancer- function as sophisticated, encrypted, or deliberately “deceptive” information systems.
Epstein portrayed the road towards them being “broken,” “decoded,” or “unmasked” by applying advanced techniques borrowed from intelligence agencies, such as cryptography, codebreaking, and signal-processing methods pioneered by organisations like the NSA and proclaiming that something natural has been discovered (while the actual encoding to the DNA Code has been done artificially, of course).
Here it becomes obvious that Epstein is trying to drive the narrative that the encoding would have happened naturally and he justifies it through his own sick fantasies (you will see further down in the article…).
This agenda was not a fleeting interest but a recurring theme, reiterated across correspondences with scientists, journalists, collaborators, and influential figures. It positioned biology not merely as a field of natural science but as a domain of adversarial information warfare, akin to cryptanalysis in espionage.
Epstein’s vision drew explicit parallels between biological signals and cryptographic principles. He argued that these systems evolved to incorporate deception (this is what they have done, they encoded it from bio-electricity) - pretending that nature introduced it as a “survival strategy”, much like how computer-encryption protects sensitive data from adversaries.
Epstein sought to pioneer a new paradigm by recruiting experts in code theory, pushing for interdisciplinary collaborations and proposing direct involvement from intelligence leaders. This new paradigm treats “life’s building blocks” as ciphertexts awaiting decryption. (Jackpot!)
Here are the key elements of this agenda, supported by direct evidence from his communications, demonstrating its consistency and depth.
Pay attention to Jeffrey’s way of presenting this sensitive topic and how he weaves it into healthcare, envisioning scenarios where his friends discover his ideas and get the Nobel Price for such efforts, basically orchestrating scientists to the point of decyphering the encrypted EZ Water Charge signals that Crick, Watson, Rosalind Franklin and others have turning into the infamous “DNA Code” 73 years ago!
“Cell signalling algorithms”, no “CRISPR CAS9” delusions!
Ladies and Gentlemen, straight from the Epstein Files:
1. Biological / Neuronal Signals as Highly Encrypted Systems
Epstein frequently described signals in biology- whether at the cellular, genetic, or neurological level- as inherently encrypted, requiring specialised decoding tools to interpret. He posited that these signals are not straightforward transmissions but complex, »obfuscated communications«, potentially unique to each organism.
In one message, he explicitly stated that “biological, cellular, neuronal signals are all highly encrypted,” which means that each organism employs “its own unique encoding algorithm.” He further noted that current maps of brain and cell activity are essentially “reading a complex ciphertext,” implying that without proper decryption, these maps remain inscrutable [1].
They are plotting and Epstein is laying out the scenario (when he says that our current signals are of little value, he is thinking about the way they are going to present the shift…):
Optogenetics, Encoding algorithm… Encryption does that sound like signals or molecules to you? This theme extended to neuronal systems, where he argued that signals are encoded in ways that “can’t be read from the outside or even the inside brain,” serving as a form of “self-protection” through deception [16]. → this way he introduces the encryption that is already in the DNA Code (from magneto- dielectric vortex motion) as a novel discovery (or he does not know about the encryption yet…).
Epstein speaks about the nature of biological signals- telling Joi Ito that “biology is more like a language, with grammar syntax rules,”… he is emphasising its structured, »encoded nature«, as opposed to the more predictable laws of physical sciences [11]. This encoding has been done by those who came before him… not by nature (which would be the underlying bio-electric / magneto- dielectric signal).
2. Applying NSA-Style Codebreaking to our Biology (EZ Water Signalling)
A central pillar of Epstein’s agenda was the direct transposition of intelligence-agency techniques- particularly those used by the NSA for signal intelligence and decryption- to decode our Electrome. He repeatedly advocated for this crossover, viewing it as a way to groundbreaking discoveries.
Epstein suggested that “the signal intelligence used by the various agencies… could be put to work on breaking the dna code or protein signal problems,” specifically invoking NSA expertise and foreign codebreaking methods [21]
In another instance, he queried whether NSA decryption methods could be applied “in biological systems,” highlighting the potential for adapting cryptographic algorithms to decode cellular communications. [8]
He pitched this idea to Tom Pritzker, explaining that the NSA “decodes signals… in many languages and math forms” and proposed using similar algorithms for “communication between cells” that “we cannot yet decode” (which is half a lie or he is not fully at the top yet at that point… or maybe it was still true that the data was not good enough… that changed, as evidenced in his correspondences) [5].
Epstein even discussed “future coordination with Keith Alexander and code breaking, used for breaking the “dna” biological code,” indicating plans to involve high-level intelligence figures like former NSA Director Keith Alexander and potentially Leon Panetta in this effort [26]. (The encoding has been done by the same people… this way of talking is deceptive, like one of his favourite phrases: “applied virology”.)
Epstein tried to naturalise encryption and decryption, so that nature is being perceived in the sick and distorted ways of his corrupted mind! He connects espionage and biology, by treating undecoded biological signals in the same way as intercepted enemy communications- which fits perfectly well to what we have been discussing last year!
3. “Genes”, “Viruses”, and Evolution as Cryptographic or »Deceptive Adversarial Systems« (…a clear sign for the fact that he used his own fantasies for this).
Epstein extended his cryptographic metaphor to evolutionary biology, portraying it as a dynamic “code war” where deception is a key “evolutionary tool”. He viewed “genes” (bio-electrical signals, reified magneto- dielectric signals) and “viruses” (nanoparticles) as engaged in perpetual cryptographic battles, with evolution itself generating misleading patterns to outmanoeuvre threats.
He described the “game of cat and mouse between “genes” and “viruses”,” where “deception, deceit, camouflage, disinformation, misinformation abound.” (That sounds like an artificial encoding and decoding, because that is what is happening- these are thoughts from the computer paradigm, not nature).
He directly compared this to “the Alice–Bob cryptanalysis that NSA uses,” a standard model in cryptography involving senders, receivers, and eavesdroppers [9].
In a 2012 email, Epstein elaborated on the “gene-virus struggle” as involving “code and code breaking,” with “DNA” structures featuring “monstrous amounts of junk combined with switches”- elements he likened to adversarial cryptography models like Alice-Bob-Mallory, where a malicious third party (a “virus”: nanoparticles that turn to hydrogels and eventually to fibers) attempts to interfere [9]. It could not be more obvious.
Earlier, he informed a journalist of his “beginning a study” on “evolutionary code dynamics,” which he defined as involving “the natural creation of deception in codes.” (These would be the NSA’s biologically encrypted biosignals, seamlessly specific to the person, through A.I. systems). [23]
He argued that evolution produces solutions “designed to fool the opponent (with “viruses” → nanoparticles),” introducing “camouflage and false weaknesses” as deliberate implementations, marking a “subtle but substantial difference” from conventional evolutionary theory [12].
”False weaknesses” is a very humanised term, or may I say - a rather Philanthropathic term to be exact, revealing Epstein’s mindset- and not the mindset of nature! As you can see, they consider themselves the gods of the story of evolution… deranged beyond belief! [12]
At this point, Epstein presents his dystopian vision as a natural occurrence, worthy of the next Nobel Prize. This is how they operate!The lower part :
“You will have a nobel prize if you get it right. There is a bold move that benefits the world.”
“The natural creation of deception in codes” is the next step in the deceptive genetics scheme, where the decoding will yield yet another batshit Nobel Price that they orchestrate like all the rest of our society, built on the silent screams of the victims… but not much longer!
This perspective is reframing evolution as an intentional system of deceptive information hiding and misdirection, ripe for cryptanalytic intervention from the NSA (and a Nobel Price for this great “discovery”)!
4. Instructions to “Unmask Hidden Biological Codes” Using Signal-Processing Techniques
Epstein was proactive in directing collaborators toward this decoding effort, emphasizing the use of NSA-like methods to reveal concealed biological information. He often highlighted the potential for Nobel-level breakthroughs if successful.
In communications with Peter Mandelson, Epstein asserted that both genes and the brain “engage in coding,” advocating for signal-processing techniques “like NSA for decoding and interception” to target “unmasking the hidden biological codes.” He reiterated the promise of a “Nobel-level discovery” through such approaches [8], [29].
He pushed for the recruitment of specialists, asking John Brockman to identify “a code theory expert on encryption de- / encryption theory” to examine “how encryption methods are used in biological systems” [19].
In several instances, Epstein urged collaborators to involve mathematicians and signal-processing experts, reinforcing the need for interdisciplinary expertise to crack these codes.
These directives reveal Epstein’s role as an orchestrator, instead of merely a theorist, in pursuing this sick agenda!
Biology as decodable Cyphertext: The justification for the big lie of Crick, Watson & Franklin!
Taken together, Epstein’s messages paint a portrait of a relentless, unified research agenda. He plots around the position that biological systems are encrypted or deceptive information architectures - that genes were “adversarial codes” (wonderfully revealing!), sees cells as undeciphered signals. Moreover, he considers natural evolution as an engine of deceptions (since the powers that shall not be have implemented these deceptions in the first place…), and even neuronal networks as “self-protecting ciphers”. By advocating for the application of intelligence-agency tools like NSA cryptanalysis, signal interception, and decryption algorithms, Epstein sought to “break” these systems, weaving the story of the discovery of “natural encryption”, that preceded his ramblings by 73 years and has been invented by Crick, Watson and Franklin already!
This framework was not scattered or merely opportunistic; it recurred across diverse correspondences, from casual exchanges to strategic proposals, often with calls for expert involvement and high-stakes collaborations. Epstein tries to frame the artificial coding of bio-electricity into genetic code as a natural motion in evolution, where he portrays the deceptive encoding of bio-electricity through the intelligence community (our “gene sequencing”) as natural cryptography. As you can see, he attempted to redefine biology through the lens of information security and codebreaking in order to prompt a paradigm shift and secure the Nobel Prize for this "revelation", which he and his vile friends have plotted and planned!
Striking Conversational details around Neurotech and Braininterfacing, 2012-20183
Final Thoughts
This is our time now!
As you can see, the entirety of Mr. Epstein’s correspondences circles around brain-interfacing, signals encoding and decoding, deceptions and “natural” exploitation, which confirms my theory (Genetics is a cypher for Bioelectricity readings) that I released in the beginning of last year, when I explored the hoax around the “discovery” of the double helix! I hope you enjoyed this article, since it is packed with insights that confirm that “DNA Code” is nothing else than a signal, as Dr. Gerald Pollack has hypothesised already:
“If the critical information is already contained in the EZ water, then why bother creating DNA? Why not rely on EZ water itself to pass on information to progeny?”
Your Leon Karmameleon
This is one of my most in depth articles, fully handwritten and worth to print as a pdf (for a reader for example, to sit in the sun).
I personally feel the effect of it and the sodium citrate and salt work in the body as well. Microscopists have shown particles that leave the body in this way… Dr. Ana was hinting at the possibility that the pulsing also creates the fibers, while pulling them out of the body… so be watchful and see how it works for you! All of that is not medical advice… I am just sharing what worked for me!
Extract:
![Ist möglicherweise ein Bild von Text „23:47 EFTA01156952.pdf justice.gov 90% From: To: Jeffrey Epstein" Subject: Re: Fwd: your neice Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:48:46 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image[57].jpg COOL!!!! I'm excited Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Also -I've been thinking a lot about that question that you asked bill gates "how do we get rid of poor people as a whole" and have an answer/ comment regarding that for you ... • When can I call you today to discuss this??“](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!DR-a!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2a681707-8e13-4f7c-b7ce-3e7c213054a4_1856x1068.jpeg "Ist möglicherweise ein Bild von Text „23:47 EFTA01156952.pdf justice.gov 90% From: To: Jeffrey Epstein\" Subject: Re: Fwd: your neice Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:48:46 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image[57].jpg COOL!!!! I'm excited Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Also -I've been thinking a lot about that question that you asked bill gates \"how do we get rid of poor people as a whole\" and have an answer/ comment regarding that for you ... • When can I call you today to discuss this??“")
This is a blatantly obvious discussion about a way to get signals intelligence encoding and biosignals together for a paradigm shift that the team around Epstein leads towards their Nobel Price for such efforts…
Striking Conversational Details from Epstein’s Neuroscience Emails (2012–2018)
The email chains reveal a strikingly intimate, intellectually charged dialogue between Jeffrey Epstein and Ed Boyden (MIT neuroscientist), often laced with Epstein’s probing questions, Boyden’s eager affirmations, and logistical flourishes that blur lines between academic exchange and personal patronage. Below, I highlight the most revealing excerpts- drawn directly from the correspondence- grouped thematically, emphasizing what they expose about Epstein’s self-positioning as a peer, the persistence of their bond post-2008 conviction, and the fusion of science, ambition, and exclusivity.
1. Epstein’s Scientific Curiosity: Probing “Control Knobs” and Neural Geometries
Epstein didn’t just fund; he engaged technically, pushing for specifics on brain tech. A May 23, 2013, email from Boyden post-meeting captures their early alignment:
“mechanistic brain maps,” “control knobs,” and using mathematics to interpret brain data.
This phrasing- likely Boyden paraphrasing Epstein’s queries—evokes optogenetics (Boyden’s specialty) as “control knobs” for neural circuits, framing the brain as hackable hardware. Strikingly casual for a convicted sex offender addressing a rising star.
By June 26–29, 2016, Epstein initiates a Skype on neuron morphology:
“I would like to talk to you about spatial location of neurons and the shapes that they may form.”
Boyden, replying from TED Summit (”Great! I’m on Skype”), responds affirmatively, underscoring deference. Later chains show Epstein following up on visualizations: “I would like to look at the inverse function of those data visualations.” This isn’t chit-chat; it’s Epstein treating Boyden as a collaborator on connectomics, his tone equal and insistent.
2. Boyden’s Enthusiasm and “Practice” of Ideas
Boyden’s replies radiate validation, often tying Epstein’s input to real progress. A November 10, 2015, thank-you email stands out:
“got a chance to practice what we discussed at the event”
Vague on the “event” (likely a prior summit), it implies Epstein’s ideas were actionable- perhaps on brain atlases or computation. Boyden’s April 19–23, 2017, “Invitation to collaborate” via shared drive is equally effusive:
“interesting papers.” ... “exciting new nexus of interesting biotech and computational insight”
Here, Boyden positions Epstein not as outsider but nexus- a “striking” elevation of the financier’s role.
The February 19, 2018, exchange on a “sleep co” venture is blunt and investor-oriented:
Epstein: “send more info on sleep co”
Boyden: “I can provide an investor deck and bring in co-founders.”
Boyden's offer of decks and introductions reveals an underlying transactional nature: science as a source of business opportunities…
3. Logistical Intimacy: Ranch Invites and “Game-Changing” Visions
Epstein’s ranch emerges as a recurring venue for unfiltered discourse. July 22–23, 2013, invites to Boyden and Martin Nowak:
“visit his New Mexico ranch in August... Dates proposed include August 10–26, with overlap possible around Aug 11–12.”
Boyden’s reply: “Sounds like fun. 8/10 I have a commitment... but I’m free on 8/11.”
Follow-ups coordinate flights (”ed boyden might come to the ranch”), blending elite access with science. A 2017 note on “Alzheimer work” escalates:
“the Alzheimer work, the status = neurotech, and my thoughts on a domain specific effort that could be game‑changing,” followed by meetings. → the fibrils and amyloid are allegedly caused by non-existing viruses, hence these hydrogels are simply the reduced graphene oxide fibers, crosslinking with metals (lanthanides, aluminium etc…) and polymers.
Epstein’s phrasing- clipped, proprietary- suggests he viewed himself as strategist, “game-changing” neurotech his domain.
4. Elite Ecosystem and Jarring Asides
The August 3, 2018, BrainMind invite ties Boyden to a “neurotechnology / brain‑science forum” with Joi Ito, Reid Hoffman:
“brain wellness, neurotech ethics, and cutting‑edge neuroscience.”
Boyden’s enthusiasm for “coaches” (2015) prompts Epstein’s private quip to Ito: “the ‘pitch’ coach, or the how to pick women coach.”
This aside- crass amid neuroscience talk- strikes as tone-deaf, revealing Epstein’s compartmentalisation.
July 2013’s “Creativity & Neuroscience” Cuba plans (via Gino Yu et al.) devolve logistically, but Epstein’s orchestration of Boyden’s “Atlas of Brain Computations” talk (July 28–29) at One Brattle Square is precise:
“Boyden submits his talk title: ‘An Atlas of Brain Computations’”
Epstein’s calendars list it alongside Diffie and Gershenfeld, framing him as convener of “mechanistic” futures.
A Pattern of Intellectual Seduction
These quotes paint Epstein as a “striking” operator: his emails are terse yet visionary, while Boyden's are responsive and deferential. The shared ranch and drives, as well as the “game-changing” rhetoric, show that Epstein sought intellectual conquests in order to launder his image, using scientists as proxies for his transhumanist dreams. Boyden’s subsequent regret (“I regretted meeting with Epstein”) highlights the power imbalance, yet the evidence suggests no coercion, merely mutual benefit. Overall, the conversations humanise the predator's network: part salon, part pitch deck, always on Epstein's terms.
I've always been able to see 'kundalini'/chakras .. tho I never really called it that. I assumed as a child this was what they were really refering to with 'dna' discussions, because it looked so similar . That bioenergy is very real and very significant. I understand it better than I understand normal biology , it makes every bit as much sense and more.
It worries me that a cabal could maybe directly target this stuff directly... tho my experiences in psi research make it seem pretty likely that if folks like me can target other people , animals , places specifically then a mechanical system could probably do the same thing . I find this so depressing.
Do you think there is any way our natural senses can counter or even stand up to this stuff ???
I'm certain their system will be more clunky and harmful than our natural experience of bioenergy. They are most likely to stuff it all up. Do you think we have natural defences somehow ??
This is all very scary :(
I think You have nailed it! Indeed, the "DNA" stuff is bunk and it's ALL electrogravitomagnetic effects.