Water is not "H₂O"- it is irreducible and archaic! Photo"Synthesis" is simply the purification of "CO₂" in Plants, no Water is being split!
The crucial role of "CO₂" in Photosynthesis has been hidden, to drive the falsified climate agenda! No water is being split anywhere. It is a deception. Water is irreducible!
“I think the chief value of science is power (…) not truth” - Yuval Harari
By the way: Hell is originally a Word for the realm of the Goddess, the Otherworld (explained further below)!
Thales of Miletus (624–546 B.C.E.), the ancient Greek philosopher from Miletus, proposed that Water (ὕδωρ, hydor) is the fundamental essence of all matter- more precisely, the originating principle(ἀρχή = archē2) - of all things in the universe.3
Another interesting claim made by Thales is the suggestion that everything has a soul (ψυχή).
For Thales, water was the very principle that held everything together (as the most basic substance from which all things emanated). This idea was groundbreaking, because it moved away from mythological explanations of the universe.
I personally see water as the bridge between Aether and Reality and as the aetheric element that manifests here as water!
Solve & Coagula … Water and Light! Water is the aetheric medium and light charges and structures it into life!
“We’ve underestimated matter... We’ve been sold this notion that matter lacks intelligence... We are finding novel proto-cognitive capacities in extremely minimal systems. And they’re surprising and shocking to us. “
“If the critical information is already contained in the EZ water, then why bother creating DNA? Why not rely on EZ water itself to pass on information to progeny?”
Dr. Michael Levin speaks about the “free lunches”, the intelligence that exists beyond the mirror (in the Otherworld):
0:00
-0:21
There clearly is another Realm and when we look at the ferrocell findings from Ken Wheeler, it becomes evident that the magneto dielectric torus and hyperboloid of light returns to this space through the zero point, which means that all the evidence from Rudolf Steiner and Dr. Paul LaViolette points towards the Aether being that World, where non-linear and conscious reaction and diffusion dynamics are taking place.
Caveat:the following perspective is a novel idea and not a cemented theorem- give it time to breathe and evolve… my initial reaction was as bewildering as yours is (very likely)! If this idea turned out to be true- that would be a beautiful thing indeed… Water, charged by Light (it fits perfectly).
Ancient sources (preserved in fragments quoted by Damascius and others) describe Hydros (Ὕδρος, literally “Water”) as one of the very first principles, emerging alongside Mud (or Thesis/ Creation in some variants). Mud solidifies into Gaia (Nature), and Hydros + Gaia then produce Chronos (Time) and Ananke (Necessity). These two serpentine beings form and coil around the cosmic egg, splitting it to birth Phanes (both female and male) and create the cosmos. »My article about this.«
Winter (also known as Sunset in the Forest) , 1862 by Louis Remy Mignot
Water is officially being portrayed as a composite of hydrogen and oxygen, H₂O. The whole world has accepted this as fact, and we have never questioned its veracity!
Both Hydrogen and Oxygen (colorless gases) have a melting point below 200 degrees celsius (14 Kelvin & 54 Kelvin), while waters melting point is 0 degrees (a colorless liquid). There are a staggering number of reasons why water cannot be made up of H₂O:
New discovery: Hydrogen Peroxide is allegedly H₂O₂ but in Reality it is just oxygenated water (added oxygen, which is very reactive and will not become a part of the water, it will just be in the water). It slowly decomposes on its own (especially in light) into water and oxygen gas. Why is the alleged H₂O not doing this already ? It is obviously a very reactive compound, even 3% of this “hydrogen peroxide” foams intensely when mixed with blood for example. → this can all be explained through charge, “oxygen” has very negative charge, hydrogen positive charge!
Light (like infrared in Pollack’s experiments) makes the bulk water more acidic (more Hydrogen, positive charge)- and the EZ zone akaline = less Hydrogen (“negative charge”, magnetic discharge of protons into bulk water, crystallisation, water structuring, EZ Zone, solidification).
I see oxidation ( + acidic, positive charge) - product of the magnetic torus that physically decomposes materials during the lotus bloom of life (the orgiastic splendour of our existence), until it returns to the center (through the zero point of inversion). The other direction of the vortex is inward (-, charging, alkaline, crystallisation / structuring), through the center, forming the EZ layer centripetally. This process is charging the aetheric water and the result is crystallisation / phase shifting (more order, anisotopic, alkaline, “negative charge”, meaning dielectric acceleration towards the zero point and structuring of the EZ Zone).
We inhale and around hydrophilic surfaces of our lungs, the air forms “negatively charged” EZ water layers, which means acceleration towards the Aether, charging / breathing in. We exhale positively charged air.
The name hydrogen is misleading, it has been called “inflammable air” and water is rather the contrary to that… (you can extingish fires with water).
Water is not made of H₂O, but it carries it (like deuterium and other isotopes).
Water can “dissolve” / carry small amounts of gases from the air, including “oxygen gas” (“O₂” = negative charge) and trace “hydrogen gas” (H₂, positive charge).
The solubility for both is extremely low though.
Natural water (rivers, lakes, oceans) “dissolves” (slightly) “O₂” from the air. At 20°C and normal pressure, about 9 mg/L (or ~0.009 g per liter) of O₂ that gets into fresh water- enough for fish and aquatic life (dissolved oxygen they say- but it is rather negative charge, which just means acceleration of the dielectric return from the magnetic torus… the electron is the reification of vortex motion). The ocean constantly exchanges “CO₂” (positively charged air, acidic) with the atmosphere. CO₂ gas from the air dissolves into seawater at the surface, following physical principles like Henry’s law (solubility depends on partial pressure, temperature, and salinity).
CO₂ is naturally present and essential in ocean chemistry (this is where the oxygen is coming from).
So water absorbs oxygen from the atmosphere to support fish- very interesting! The problem with that is, that deep sea fish survive even without that oxygen (I found this study after finishing the article, which shows that it is “negative charge” we are breathing, not “oxygen”):
Get to the entire Study by Dr. Gerald Pollack: [13]
H₂ (hydrogen) gas is extremely insoluble in water though: only about 0.0016 mg/L (1.6 ppb) at 20°C and normal pressure.
If water is allegedly made from hydrogen, why is hydrogen so extremely water-phobic? This does not make any sense, when you think about the alleged chemical composition of water. But when you realise that hydrogen is rather “inflammable air” and water is another element altogether, it finally makes sense.
Mass spectrometry is measuring intrinsic charge - this is the same story as the gene sequencing deception, after all!The introduction of inputs and specific interpretations are all based on these charge readings and can easily be manipulated.
The testing of oxygen is based on PH meters, so essentially what is being measured is the acidity (Reason 78).
“The name oxygen was coined in 1777 by Antoine Lavoisier, whose experiments with oxygen helped to forcefully discredit the then-popular Phlogiston theory of combustion and corrosion. Its name originates from the Greek words oxys, “acid” meaning ”sharp” and genes, “producer”, literally “begetter”.”6
“The Law of Conservation of Mass was introduced by Antoine Lavoisier in 1789 (pictured above) and in terms of chemical reactions, the law states that mass, in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations. This understanding is analogous to the Law of Conservation of Energy. Appertaining to water, Lavoisier's law simply affirms that if water (in one form or another) is present at the start of a reaction, water will be present at the end of a reaction, in one form or another; if water goes in, water must come out.
So it seems the very properties of water are dictated by the very law Lavoisier conceived: Water can never be created nor destroyed - water can only be changed from one form to another(as vapour, liquid over EZ to solid).
From this, water cannot comprise hydrogen and oxygen and water cannot be brought about solely from a reaction between hydrogen and oxygen.”
“Before Lavoisier introduced his theory of oxidation, the Phlogiston theory was the popular theory of the time to explain combustion and corrosion. The four classical elements earth, air, fire and water underpinned the theory. So, if one supported the theory of phlogiston one would consider water to be just that, water.
However, it is the understanding of the author, that Lavoisier and possibly other notable chemists of the day were eager to replace the widely accepted Phlogiston theory. Chemists at the time, along with other groups, wanted to destroy the bond humans have with their natural selves. Lavoisier’s theory of oxidation satisfied this purpose as it placed Oxygen at the heart of all four elements; air, fire, earth and of course water.
Soon after, water was to become comprised of hydrogen and oxygen or H₂O and cease to be an element in its own right.”
“As far as the author is aware not one person has replicated Lavoisier’s experiment with his glass balloon as described in his traiteire de Chimie published in 1789. It is this experiment where he incorrectly determined water to comprises hydrogen and oxygen. If this demonstration conclusively proved water to consist of hydrogen and oxygen, the apparatus or similar would be a familiar site within all chemistry classrooms.”
The early electrolysis puzzle (Nicholson, 1800): Water should decompose into H₂ and O₂ everywhere, yet gases appear separately at distant electrodes. This falsified Lavoisier’s view of water as a compound.Rittercountered: electrolysis is synthesis: negative electricity + water → hydrogen (centripetal charging of the aether, matter formation, a compound of vortex motion); positive electricity + water → oxygen (centrifugal disscharge, compound of vortex motion); water is the aetheric element.
Leaving Chemical Delusions behind! The charge paradigm and the vortex paradigm go hand in hand (centripetal charging = negative charge, centrifugal blooming happens through positive charge).
Photosynthesis is officially being portrayed as a very complex process that leads to the splitting of water…7
Reality:
Carbon Dioxide (+Light & Water) → Charge taken for Glucose and to release purify the air (negative charge) through the plant!
Everything is actually charge based. Positive charge is acidic (like “CO₂”) and negative charge is alkaline (the acceleration of the dielectric return of the magneto- dielectric torus of light).
Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
“The face of water, in time, became a wonderful book- a book that was a dead language to the uneducated passenger, but which told its mind to me without reserve, delivering its most cherished secrets as clearly as if it uttered them with a voice. And it was not a book to be read once and thrown aside, for it had a new story to tell every day.” Mark Twain
The discovery of Photo»Splitting« (not “synthesis”) of CO₂!
Plants purify the air by releasing oxygen from CO₂. (Before the charge based paradigm of Dr. Gerald Pollack- you can see CO₂ as positively charged, acidic and oxygen as negatively charged, alkaline). Plant’s love the acidic part… it is one big cycle involving the Aether… but first some history:
Joseph Priestley discovered that plants purify air by releasing a gas (later identified as oxygen) while taking up “fixed air”8 (“CO₂”). Together with Jan Ingenhousz (1779), he discovered that plants were essentially “splitting CO₂”- taking the carbon for growth and releasing oxygen as a byproduct.
In the 1930s, Cornelis van Niel saw that splitting as well and he recognised that the energy for the sugar production comes from the “CO₂” at the same time.
Photosynthesis is essentially a splitting process. Plants take the carbon from CO₂ to make sugars and release oxygen from it. That’s it!
Then Samuel Ruben and Martin Kamen (1941)9 used heavy oxygen isotopes (¹⁸O) as tracers:
Plants given H₂¹⁸O (labeled water) + normal CO₂ "released ¹⁸O₂.
Plants given normal H₂O + C¹⁸O₂ allegedly released mostly normal ¹⁶O₂.
This “proved” the O₂ comes from water, not CO₂. But the mass spectrometry process is heavily controlled and the findings before make much more sense, especially regarding Occam’s razor!
Nature operates simply. It is very ironic that we can utilise a graphic that allegedly explains the complexity of nature to falsify this theory with their own material. There is no reason for overkill like here- it works just as shown on the right side10:
LEFT SIDE : Obfuscation Scheme RIGHT SIDE : Reality. The official explanation on the left ignores the presence of oxygen in CO2 and shows that nature would allegedly use an extremely complex route for it, while co2 is there all alone!
The right side shows how it really works and the left side is the obfuscation scheme11 about alleged “water splitting”. Hydrogen’s older name was “inflammable air”12- basically “pyrogen”, not “hydrogen” (page 155). This book is very interesting, besides one error about the weight of oxygen- where he took the measurement of two for one (then he fell for the flat-earth psyop… ). But his ideas about water are extremely interesting and rational: [232].
“Water is a substance that essentially decomposes or breaks down matter into components.” 100 reasons why Water is not H2O. (Forgive Pete and Peter that they are flat-earthers…the best disproof of “flat earth theory” so far. Their reasoning around water is top notch! The intricacy of the flat earth curse has infiltrated so many beautiful minds… it is indeed concerning but no one has it all and many people can think deeply but not clearly.)
Occam’s Razor tells us that the oxygen must come from the carbon dioxide, that brings the oxides ready to purify! Source
This is the official “consensus”:
We have an extremely complex and obscure splitting process of water on the one hand and the simple release of usable oxygen (inhale: negatively charged air, exhale: positively charged air) into “water byproducts”on the other hand. Occam’s razor tells me that the “oxygen” comes from the “CO₂” (alkalisation of plants) directly and in fact, this has been seen in science for hundreds of years until isotope tracers obfuscated this finding and turned CO₂ into a villain (best scientific falsification of the climate claims around CO₂)!
CO₂ is not a pollutant, it is in fact the source of our plants sugar and (after the purification through plants) our oxygen to breathe!
By the way, listen to Jordan Peterson’s rant that dismantles the lies about CO₂ as a villain in one minute! Link to the best scientific falsification of the assumptions around CO₂ as the driver of “climate change”: [31]
Thusly the oxygen from the CO₂ allegedly ends up in “water byproducts”... And on top of that, the water needs to be split through a very complex process, to extract such oxygen… this logical / efficiency error has not been recognised anywhere, so it seems! Why don’t we simply take the oxygen from the “water byproducts”? The answer is that we already do that and that this is the way it works naturally. No water is being split. Occam’s razor tells us that the plant takes what it needs for starch and frees the oxygen for our breathing (occam’s razor: the oxygen is right there in the CO₂).
The plant is literally purifying the air by releasing oxygen from the CO₂, fuelled by light!
No “water molecules” are being split!
Dr. Gerald Pollack confirms the scepticism around Water as H2O!
Dr. Gerald Pollack does never look happy neither, when he has to mention organic chemistry and underlines that we do not understand water “molecules” yet:
“I want to reemphasize that we’re not dealing with water at the molecular level; we’re dealing with crowds of water molecules. We don’t yet understand water molecules”.
The following academic publication examines the difficulties of chemical definitions for the miraculous element water [second: [34]:
This study is very interesting and shows that the ratio of oxygen and hydrogen in water does not proof that water is made of it directly, it is only the ratio and deuterium was found as well and the chemical definition of h2o is problematic overall.
Water is Not H₂O (by Michael Weisberg) points out that water is a dynamic substance with ionic species clusters, and isotopic variants- not purely neutral H₂O molecules.
“Quantum electrodynamics (QED)”: Del Giudice described water as forming coherent domains where molecules oscillate in phase, driven by electromagnetic fields. This creates extended coherent structures with collective properties differing from random hydrogen-bonded networks.
Pollack describes the field of water science as “schizophrenic,” with mainstream scientists using simulations to study individual H₂O molecules, while dismissing many of his astonishing findings (like the structured phase) as fringe, akin to cold fusion, UFOs (built through the work of T. T. Brown) and subtle energies (acknowledged by Dr. Gerald Pollack himself).
“The more anomalies we have, the more we begin to think that maybe there’s something fundamental about water that we really don’t know.” Dr. Gerald Pollack
There are unexplained anomalies like variable freezing/ boiling points, the expansion when freezing and that it becomes less dense & floats as ice.
Water’s triple point
The triple point occurs, where the solid, liquid, and gas transition curves meet (forgetting the structured EZ phase). The triple point is the only condition in which all three phases can coexist, and is unique for every material. Water reaches its triple point at just above freezing (0.01° C) and at a pressure of 0.006 atm.
Look how desperately they are trying to prove the synthesis of water from oxygen and hydrogen: [22]. This reminds me of the “moon landing”. Isn’t it strange that we have been shown the reaction of oxygen and hydrogen for decades upon decades, but a gaseous reaction from palladium would have allegedly succeeded on the 6. of January, “for the first time” (the article to the video: [23]. The confirmation for water comes from oxygen binding affinity- so either ambient water was extracted from the environment, the bubble was not water or the test was fraudulent! All in all the presentation is logically flawed, since such a possibility would revolutionise the world, since clean water is rarer and rarer on this planet (since nothing is lost, everything is transformed…).
What does that mean?
If it turns out as true, water is archaic, primal - the aspect of Yin (Aether) in the Yang (Reality). Water and Light as Ψ & Φ.
Water cannot be split and oxygen always comes from a different source. [67] Water is the medium of the Aether and what we call the “5th element”. The aetheric side is different than our manifestation in Reality, of course. And the zero point in the center of everything connects both realms. (a non Cartesian Nexus, the Inversion Lens).
Photosynthesis is being portrayed in a complicated and deceptive way, just as neurotransmitters and psychedelics / hormones.After all, it is an obfuscation scheme- just like the others!
The umbilical cord connects the fetus to the placenta, where oxygen from the mother’s blood diffuses into the fetal blood. This oxygenated blood then travels to the fetus via the umbilical vein in the cord, while deoxygenated blood returns to the placenta through the two umbilical arteries.This process supplies all the oxygen and nutrients the fetus needs, as the fetal lungs are not yet functional for breathing air.
Birth, condensation of life, happens through light and water. The breathing comes later and the oxygen is being supplied through the umbilical chord, it is not secreted from the water… our first breath happens later when we are born! Occam’s razor tells us that plants are simply splitting co2 and releasing the oxygen into the air, purifying it in that sense, just like it has been seen before Samuel Ruben and Martin Kamen’s came along with their tracers in 1941.
The Light of Reality moves through the Aether - which brings the Charge for our Feelings, Thoughts and Imaginations. Light consists of one vortex field that has two parts: 1) a centrifugal magnetic 2) a centripetal dielectric one. A masculine swing and a feminine return. The centrifugal part is masculine and the centripetal part is the yin (feminine, Aether, the Inside) in the yang (masculine, Reality, the Outside).
The Yin and Yang is not between day and night, not between light and “shadow” (which is just an absence of light)- the complementary other side to Reality (Yang, the external World) is the Aether (Yin, currently our internal experience), the Otherworld, the Land of Death & Imagination! Death (breathing out) is just the opposite of Birth (breathing in), this mutual breathing is eternal!
“Life is not the opposite of death.
Death is the opposite of birth.
Life is eternal.”
Shapes from the Otherworld (originally an ink drawing by me).
In anthroposophical medicine, bodily fluids (blood, lymph) serve as primary mediums for etheric forces, while the imbalances in water metabolism directly relate to etheric disruptions.
People from the Aranda tribe in central Australia, when talking of the other world, explained that the branches of the Ilumba-trees there are not growing upwards, as they grow on earth, but growing downwards (Strehlow, 1907). Langobard worriers had to ride, sitting backwards on their horse, towards Odin’s shrine for worship, using their backward stretched arms to tear off a sample from a (ceremonial) pelt (Vita barbate Episcopi Benev.) (Menghin, 1985).
In other ceremonies of different cultures clothes had to be dressed the wrong way, animals had to be conducted from the stable backward, male dresses had to be exchanged for female ones, images had to be turned around (Rudolf Steiner confirms an actual inversion on the aetheric side). Acts of inversion are already mentioned in the Lex Salica from the 6th century (Lex Salica, 6th century) .
The centre mirrors our physical body, but never mathematically. The pineal gland is in the middle and there is always a dominant side, like the dominant spin of the vortices which are compounding all the elements based on hydrogen (while water is even more primal, irreducible). The physical world is the torus fountain of life that returns to charge the aether, to structure water around hydrophilic surfaces (water loving, creating EZ layers that bring the charge separation of our Bioelectricity). The centripetal charging is very coherent and brings EZ water-structuring. The magnetic torus (centrifugal-magnetic lotus flower blooming) acts as the inducer/ perturber that reorganises water. All of this is based on vortices and all of life communicates through these two spiralling motions.
The Origin of the Word Hell
The word Hell is a term for the goddess of the Otherworld and the realm of death!
The English word “hell” derives from Old English hel or helle, which referred to the netherworld or abode of the dead as early as around 725 AD (first attested in texts like the Corpus Glossary or early Anglo-Saxon writings translating Christian concepts).
This comes from Proto-Germanic haljō (or xaljō- meaning “concealed place” or “underworld”), derived from the Proto-Indo-European root ḱel- (”to cover, conceal, hide”), related to verbs like helan (”to hide”).
The Old Norse name Hel (both the goddess and her realm) comes from the exact same Proto-Germanic root haljō.The goddess Hel rules the underworld realm also called Hel (or Helheim), a “cold, shadowy place” for those who died of old age or illness (not battle).
Hell = haljō = Hel = The Complementary Otherworld = The Underworld = The Land of Imagination (Fantastica) = Atlantis = Levin’s Platonic Realm = the Aether = the Other Side.
The Aether is the complementary Otherworld to Reality!
No lines of force of any field can terminate into space, they can however terminate into counter-space, which is one of the other main missing secrets of Nikola Tesla.Ken Wheeler
Dr. Paul LaViolette sees the Etheron Gradients as Conscious Entities in the Aether:
As you can see, the Aether is indirectly being recognised as a world by Dr. Paul LaViolette. The Aether is deeply tied to water, both in the sense of the yin and yang principle, where the inside experience and feminine aspect is tied to water and because water is the irreducible bridge between the Inside and the Outside World:
Victor Schauberger called Water the Lifeblood of the Planet!
Sketch from Victor Schauberger
Sunflower
Viktor Schauberger explicitly viewed water as having a centripetal, inward-spiraling nature in its healthy, vital state. He observed that natural water movement follows centripetal, implosive vortices- spiraling inward in cycloid or hyperbolic paths, which purifies, densifies, and energises water (reaching its peak density and vitality near +4°C). This contrasts with centrifugal, explosive motion, which he saw as destructive, heating, and degenerative (while they are also creating space- comment from Telestai Nexus!). Technically speaking, the torus of the magnetic part is constructive too, in the sense of creating space and the orgiastic splendour of nature- while the dielectric return is bringing back coherence and density / charging of the aether (both are on the same vortex and the displacement of etheron gradients (compressions and extensions in the aetheric water) is what marks either magnetic- or dielectric dominance… so the dielectric and centripetal return is actually the destruction of the constructive space creation of the magnetic release of aetheric charge… it is one huge cycle through the aether and this has been shown for the first time 10 years ago- through the ferrocell!
Spiral with 14 arms formed in the water of a cup subjected to a sound vibration of 102.528 Hz Sound Images of Water, published by Médicis, 2005
Schauberger believed that vortex dynamics in water bear the secret to zero point energy and he was correct (just like rodin):
Zero point energy coils based on Victor Schauberger’s work!
Herewith we mark the end of the chinese year of the snake and I think that Telestai Nexus has paid tribute to it quite extensively (the double ouroboros symbol, Ψ & Φ, the vortex paradigm)!
Snakes and Water, the Aether and Reality, (re)discoveries about our nature and insights that bring us back on track! Seeing that photosynthesis is simply splitting CO₂ changes our understanding of reality. In order to turn CO₂ into a villain, it needed to be made peripheral. The oxygen ends up in “water byproducts”, while an allegedly very complex splitting process of water would take place at the same time, which does not make any sense. In reality, the plant simply splits CO₂ and uses what it needs for glucose / starch and releases the oxygen as purified air, while light brings the energy through EZ layers of water! Water is irreducible and fundamental. Nature is much more simple than we have thought!
We are never deceived; we only deceive ourselves.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Thank you so much for reading through this and see you “next year”!
All of my material is entirely for free so feel free to share it as long as we can…
Your Leon Karmameleon!
Water is made of Aetheric Water, not Hydrogen and Oxygen!
“Water is probably the most mysterious and least fathomable of all the elements--so many-facetted, yet so potentially still and passive; so formless and adaptable--yet following laws of its own. Peculiar and apparently contradictory manifestations, to take but the simple phenomena of its volume increase as water freezes! “Still waters run deep”-- and the mysterious depths draw many curious probers.” Source
Cutting edge talk (I would not say that Reality is an illusion but the Otherworld is fused with our Reality like Yin and Yang, one cannot be without the other):
Click the Image to get to the article. The author attacks a deranged form of Gnosticism, no the original idea- other than that, top notch
The word hydrogen originating from late 18th century was coined in French from the Greek word hudro “water” and genēs meaning “begetter”. Hydrogen essentially means ‘water former’ as it was observed water was always produced when the gas burned.
At the time of its discovery in 1766, Cavendish referred to hydrogen as “inflammable air” as it was the only gas at the time that was flammable. Given what has been laid bare in prior reasons, it is the author’s understanding that hydrogen could have been more appropriately named “pyrogen” to reflect the gases property of combustibility – pyro from the Greek word πυρ (pyr), meaning “fire” and genēs meaning “begetter”. Interestingly though, Cavendish had considered hydrogen to be phlogiston and it is the author’s view there was a growing agenda to destroy the Phlogiston theory and by naming hydrogen after its combustible property would only serve to reinforce the survival of the theory. Regardless, water is allegedly made up of two components that have been incorrectly named and is another reason why H2O can never be water. Source
χ = chi for charge in there, the aetheric potential force that brings the magneto- dielectric lotus blossom of life (the aetheric discharge). This fits to Wilhelm Reich’s view of Orgone as the fundamental life force! Water, charged by light, brings this into our world, literally through the liquid crystalline state of water that animates all of life!
While later philosophers like Aristotle included water as one of four classical elements (along with earth, air, and fire), Thales uniquely posited it as the sole primary substance- a monistic view.
In Ken Wheeler’s (Theoria Apophasis) metaphysical and field-based theories, “incommensurability” is a central concept borrowed from ancient Pythagorean philosophy, which he elevates as the “greatest secret of the Pythagoreans.” It refers to that which is “without measure” (uncountable or irrational), “without a horizon, or line, or location” (from the Greek aoristos dyas or a-horizmos), representing the infinite, self-similar, and non-localizable nature of the Absolute (the One or divine principle) and its manifestations in the ether, fields, geometry, and phenomena like water or consciousness. This is not just mathematical irrationality (like √2 or phi, the golden ratio) but a metaphysical attribute enabling beauty, divine proportionality, simplicity, and holographic self-similarity—where “the whole is found complete in the parts, and the parts contain the image of the whole.”
To break it down by key contexts in his work:
Metaphysical and Philosophical Foundations
Incommensurability is the “uncountable/without measure” extrinsic attribute of the Absolute (the transcendent One), which is self-similar and manifests through emanation (as in Neoplatonism and Pythagoreanism). It allows for infinite, fractal-like expression without finite boundaries or dualities—there are “no dualities in nature,” only conjugate aspects operating in unison. Wheeler ties it to the “indefinite dyad” (aoristos dyas), an attribution like light to illumination, where qualities exist projectively without specific locus. This is the foundation of his rejection of materialism, particles, and relativity, emphasizing ether as the infinite medium.
In Magnetism and Fields
Fields (magnetic, dielectric, etc.) exhibit incommensurability because they are present throughout an object or system but have “no actual Cartesian value that can be localized” or specific position—there’s “no location.” For example, in a magnet (a “conjugate magneto-dielectric field system”), polarity is a “mirage” or pressure abstraction without a true locus: “there is no place or location in a bar magnet that contains a north ‘pole’ or a south.” Cutting a magnet doesn’t separate poles but creates two new whole magnets, demonstrating holographic self-similarity—”it’s present all the way throughout, but there’s no location.” The fields are ether-mediated pressure gradients, not emitted from the magnet itself, making them inherently unmeasurable in finite terms.
In Geometry and Proportions
Geometrically, incommensurability involves irrational ratios (phi = 1.618…., √5) that can’t be expressed as simple fractions, forming “perfect harmonic” structures like the Pythagorean pentagram (in triplicate) or triangle. This is the “proportion and ratio of the One to itself,” a “cosmic incommensurability of perfection” and metaphysical mirror of totality. Angles like 85° (equal to the “divine one”), 108°, and 137.5077° (the golden angle) embody this, seen in nature (e.g., sunflower seeds, sand dollars, human nervous systems) as self-similar growth patterns. Wheeler links 360° (circle) to these: 85 × 5³ ≈ 360, derived from ancient knowledge.
Overall, Wheeler uses incommensurability to unify his ether-centric worldview: it’s the key to understanding infinite, non-dual, self-similar reality, rejecting finite measurements or particles in favor of fields and emanations. His ideas are speculative and draw from ancient sources, often presented as revelations overlooked by modern science.
At the time of naming, it was mistakenly thought that all acids required oxygen in their composition.* However, if we look at the properties of oxygen it can be clearly observed that oxygen fortifies or intensifies the characteristics of another element. For example, oxygen intensifies a burning flame, oxygen can help a metal sustain its metallic lustre, oxygen when inhaled, is “five or six times as better as common air” (words from Joseph Priestley).
From this, oxygen would only strengthen a property of an acid, in this case the ‘sharpness’ and not create it.
So it can be taken oxygen was named incorrectly because it was not an acid producer; the acid was already present before the addition of oxygen.
To reinforce this understanding, sulphuric acid has the chemical symbol H2SO4 and contains three elements hydrogen (H), sulphur (S) and oxygen (O).
A number of responders replied and the best method to identify the source of the gases was to use isotopic markers. The use of a radio active substance would literally ‘stain’ either the electrolyte or the water allowing a substance to be traced. However this method is unreliable as cross contamination would likely spoil any findings and any results would be questionable. There is no reliable way to conclusively identify the origin of the gases produced during the electrolysis of potassium hydroxide (KOH), let alone any other electrolyte. So it is clearly incomprehensible to claim gas products come from water when nobody can ever provide conclusive proof to support the claim. Source
I think none of this is happening. Just like the ion channels and membranes that do not exist, co2 allegedly enters a very complex cycle- when in reality, it simply comes from the co2 and ends up “in the water byproduct” (in the air as oxygen, air!)- when water is allegedly split in an impossibly complex way that would spook every computer hacker, just to get it out of there…
The explanation is extremely detailed and we know from the hoax around ion channels and neurotransmitters / hormones, that complexity is being abused to make us “trust the experts” who are paid to believe the delusion.
The plant is simply splitting CO2 to make Glucose for starch and release oxygen for us to breathe… it purifies the air. THIS IS A DELUSION:
“Inflammable air” is the historical name given to hydrogen gas by the English scientist Henry Cavendish in 1766.
Cavendish isolated the gas by reacting metals (such as zinc, iron, or tin) with acids (like hydrochloric or sulfuric acid) and described its properties in his paper “On Factitious Airs.” He called it “inflammable air” because it was highly flammable- it burned vigorously in air and formed explosive mixtures.At the time, gases were often referred to as different kinds of “air,” and “inflammable” highlighted its key characteristic: the ability to catch fire easily (note that “inflammable” means the same as “flammable” in older English usage). Although earlier scientists (like Robert Boyle in the 17th century) had produced the gas without recognizing it as a distinct substance, Cavendish was the first to identify it as a unique element and study its properties in detail, including its low density (about 1/14th that of common air). Later, in 1783–1787, Antoine Lavoisier renamed it hydrogen (from Greek hydro- “water” + -gen “producer”) after confirming that burning it with oxygen produces water.
If the ‘electrolysis of water’ was true and water could be split into hydrogen and oxygen, then it would follow if more water was added the yield of gas products i.e. hydrogen and oxygen, would increase. However, this is not the case as one has to increase the amount or concentration of electrolyte to increase the rate of gas production.
STRUCTURED WATER. That’s what we need!
Very interesting ! Thank- you .