44-70% of our body is charged liquid crystal, mostly EZ water- and that phase shifts constantly! This is the basis of our bioelectric communication. Liquid Crystals are the 4th state of water.
Your article reminds me of Mae-Wan Ho’s The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms. Long before today’s debates, she described organisms as liquid crystalline beings and coherent light emitters, with biological water playing a central role. What you write here echoes some of those pioneering insights from biophysics, even if approached from a different angle.
Thank for mentioning her work! I was going to write the same, but checking the comments first. Her work is wonderful for anyone who wants to delve deep into it.
Thanks so much for this info. It seems to be supportive of my theory:
COVID = COmputational Viral Infectious Disease. The Dis-Ease is manifested by the exact mechanisms described here.
Also
Klaus Schwab foreshadows a digital pandemic…but I don’t think he’s talking about a computer virus. Or a logistical nightmare. I believe his Digital Plandemic will be “computationally directed assembly” of a disease -in real time, in vivo. And it will be directed by our cellular devices and accomplished via frequency modulation.
There is always more to consider when one considers the design of the Biofield. It is as complex as our Universe.
At the very beginning of mitosis the field begins in sacred geometry i.e. the torus. Sacred geometry continues in our design at micro and macro levels. D.N.A is directed by a field before it becomes matter.
I feel it is plausible ThaT control system is a holographic Jing Luo foremost. The T.C.M Jing Luo is way more important in relation to how we form and to how we function. The 8 extraordinary meridians guide cell division from start to finish.
All the points you share are valid. Moving forward we now have more interactive discussion groups to advance Biofield theory.
As you know current physiology is describing a system ThaT is too slow. This is not the case. There are trillions of cellular interactions happening per second operating at room temperature superconductivity.
The Jing Luo Biofield manifested even before d.n.a & crystalline structured water. They are fully interactive with one another.
I just realised that the old gnostic tale from Sophia that became earth might be explaining plasma water (4th state of matter )... this fits perfectly to our discussion and it also makes sense in regards to Pollack's view about water and the origin of life. So water becomes a liquid crystal (4th state of water... they need to change it for matter so plasma becomes the 5th ;) ) when hit by light and the charge makes condensation possible, which might very well be the origin of life on earth: https://emmind.net/openpapers_repos/Endogenous_Fields-Mind/Water_EMF/Exclusion_Zones/2022_EZ_Water_and_the_Origin_of_Life.pdf
Water is so deeply fascinating, isn’t it? We have both had an ‘aha’ moment. I’m going to make a pot of tea and read the article. Thank-you for linking it.
p.s: so many memories are returning as I reflect upon your response from all the things JLL taught us over the years. ;-)
Ha well forget his rants about DNA because the double helix is pure fantasy.. Pollack describes how he almost understands that later on though :) ... Yes incredible ... I came through Dominique Guillet to John Lamb Lash ... a french whistleblower who translated 30 of his books into french... John told me once, that it cannot be conclusively said, wether it is a good idea or not, to follow the light tunnel that will appear at the moment of death (regarding archontic traps).... I was so glad that message got through ... thanks to Dominique !
Indeed- according to Pollack, there is a connection and that needs to be addressed ! But they are distinct ... so someone needs to make a decision here...
A lot of writers fall into the trap of using jargon and acronyms, thinking their readers know what they are talking about. For instance, what is ELF? You should probably explain your jargon when you use it. Otherwise - great read!
“The Unveiling of the Magic Spell: Natural Law Versus Legal Law
How the Illusion of the Legal System Grants Immunity to the Powerful
The COVID era was a moment of stark revelation, a time when a "magic spell" was dramatically lifted. What many of us didn't fully appreciate before this was just how pervasive this magic spell truly was. We exist in a world where we constantly weave between two fundamental realities: one is natural law, and the other is legal law. These two systems may sound similar, but their applications and underlying principles are profoundly different. The key difference is that the legal system is essentially a sleight of hand, a "magical spell" designed to allow certain people to evade the consequences that natural law demands. The time has come to understand this fundamental duality and recognize the true nature of the system we live under.”
Little correction : I wrote 99% of molecular "weight" is water, but I meant the molecular count! If we would count every single water molecule, that would be 99% water - the volume is about 2/3 of our body of course! Cheers
::: Addition for the readers : Thanks to Proton Magic I have updated the introduction about the Graphene part. He is right, our modern definition is wrong (surely with intention) especially graphetizing carbons are the basis for GO but they are not 1 atom thick, in fact, Rosalind found 0.335 nm spacing of layers, exactly the measure they used for nucleotides!
Yes. Rosalind Franklin discovered it. They did not have a name yet- in 1951 (the year of the invented "photograph 51" that they took inspired by chateau chambord in france) the link to her study is in the article! It is not hypothetical, they literally stole the measurement for the single sheet (0.34 nm / 0.335 nm) with its aperiodic imperfections for the invention of aperiodic genetic code! They gave the hypothetical nucleotide the same measure. That one is hypothetical ;-) Rosalind Franklin did not agree though. Her findings are used for crystallography of graphene and isolation too. They are lying to the public and cointel accounts that also perpetrate "fake space" and "fake cgi", just because google does that on purpose to get us into flat earth... at the same time these accounts were spreading fear against anti-oxidants like naturally extracted or fermented vitamin c and edta. It was vile, detoxing was basically generally rendered toxic, just because of the hijacking of the industry by the powers that shall not be etc.
I got the pristine form in my guitar box, it helped when a 4x4 drove over it once- that is the only place where I want to use it :-)
Thousands of studies that proof how they sneak it into our products: xochipelli.substack.com
Check my former articles for dozens of spectroscopy results.
Check the way it can be produced through jet combustion and additives, all background checked- last link from Dominique Guillet!
This is literally deeply entrenched in the double helix hoax.
ON PAGE 666, and the color image of the atoms of graphene has 6 sections.
They say it is hypothetical.
Spectroscopy finds elements in material not the structure. Where is it proven to be 1 atom and not just ultra thin grapite?
On DNA they had a very poor photo, of ??? and made math equations to get a dougle helix which seems like a leap of logic and the bases were supposedly found by Kossel but he never had any paper finding them.
Discovery was in 1951 - 666 is just our carbon nature, 6 electrons, 6 protons, 6 neutrons ;-) They are having fun with all these stories ... Agent is going the way of "fake space" - hinting at the cgi all over google.
The powers that shall not be are laughing their asses off and many of us believe their obfuscation. Of course space exists and there are beautiful constellations in the sky every night, totally congruent to ancient astrological models and temples / pyramid alignments!
Discovery of graphene in 1951? That requires 1 atom sheet as that is the definition. Just wondering if you have a paper proving this, seems not, which means we need to stop using the word graphene as an actual thing.
I see what you are saying. They made that single atom sheet definition on purpose - the thing is, GO hydrogels are a thing in the industry and if we stop using that term we don't know what we are describing but I agree that it is imprecise- but the whole story from 2004 was BS so let's just use the term graphene oxide for these layered and highly organized sheets! The material that rosalind found exists, it has a thickness of 0.335 nm and many layers are on top of each other and with oxygen functional groups it is a liquid crystal. We have the same problem with DNA - it was Nuclein, then they changed the definition to deoxyribonucleic acid and then again to the aperiodic code invention!
I think it is very similar to the EZ water that becomes structured ... they always derange the definitions, I agree - like they did with "DNA". When you say DNA does not exist, it is both wrong and right. The original definition as a liquid exists, but not as a molecule.
LC graphene exists in our body, but the single sheets are layered - not isolated in our body of course... the terminology is used for functioning wound dressing hydrogels- I mean 2020 we put that crap all over our body (the "desinfection gels" ... then they gave us the masks to get a reload, the 6 feet apart to read our biology ... it seems to be great fun!
In fact, I learned a great deal about their psychopathy by following everything they put out regarding graphene and it is a fun fact that the alleged spike proteins elemental composition fits 1:1 to a graphene qdot that can be bought from thermofisher for bioimaging (500 dollars a vial)... these are not liquid crystals though- these are colloids and they got a coating
there is a difference between graphetizing carbons and non-graphetizing - you can call that isolated layer graphene and in fact that word is now used and her methods are used for crystallography etc ... all in my article about franklin that I highly recommend
I am talking about graphetizing layers with 0.335 nm thickness, a well organized crosslinked structure- this is the same material that is used in the industry as LCGO (liquid crystal graphene oxide) hydrogels etc.
I agree that they defined it wrong in 2004- on purpose- the whole industry is using this term though, so should we change and obfuscate what we are talking about and call it precisely graphetizing graphite all the time ? It is better to call out the false definition...
I am well aware of the bulldozing efforts from cointel that wants us to ignore metamaterials, metal contamination, interfacing materials- they want us to think about genocide or fraud- Latypova dismissed the content of the pfizer vials as contaminating crap... well I argue otherwise
I sent you her discovery paper twice. I said twice that they did not have a name for it yet but after lying initially, grok concurred and even the furious dr. hill needed to admit that she discovered it. Her methods are now standard. These sheets are layered, she measured them: 0.34 nm / 0.335 nm - the same they used for the invention of the nucleotide - THAT part is hypothetical :-)
I don't see how they can sus-out a 1 atom thick material in '51 but not on '04 or even '25. Atoms are hypothetical anyway. I think we have both said our parts so lets call it a day!
The structure is shown in x ray crystallography and Rosalinds methods are still standard. She was surely not isolating these sheets yet, and we are not dealing with single sheets but liquid crystal forms of stacked GO that crosslink with metals and PVA for example - these are the hydrogels, basis for the fibers etc.
Yes - please read my article about Franklin. This discovery is deeply connected to the invention of the double helix and my genetics article links to a book with 144 pages (search for that)- afterwards you are going to be convinced that the double helix does not exist :-)
Yes, I am saying the same, there is no double helix nor any DNA period.
But my q was on graphene, if it is hypothetical how and where is the proof of isolation and structure determination? Spect doesn't determine structure. If you don't have the proof that is ok of course.
The entire basis of the invention of aperiodic molecular code is based on the imperfections that Rosalind found on single sheets and this method for structural analysis is now standard. They did not have a name for it yet, as I mentioned earlier. It is not only not hypothetical, it has been the basis of the molecular distraction campaign and I also argue that virology is entirely there to hide the damage of metamaterials plus interfacing, namely dozens of metals and other particles that help interfacing us. They are shown in body scans all over the world and when I started to properly chelate, all joint pains disappeared and my whole system is working much clearer. I am deeply grateful that I did not fall for the disinfo campaigns around detoxing, namely the fear inducing strategy to point out synthetic contaminations while dismissing anti-oxidants like glutathione or ascorbic acid in general- that have a great effect against all the cationic inflammation
thank you for your writing. i have followed as much as i can for a while despite not being able to fully comprehend all the more technical info. i had come across gerard pollack's work before via other means but your integration of it here with other discovery has painted a much clearer picture for me to see. this article now has been a big help in my 'getting it'.
i have been put off trying any kind of use of possible chelating substances/supplements due to concerns about further toxicity.
i wonder if you would mind sharing fully exactly what you have found to work for you and how you have used such things?
or link where you have put this in a previous article that i might have missed?
The work for the structure was the crystallography and when you read my article about rosalind, you will see that they really found a different structure through specific heating and this type of liquid crystal is extremely useful for them and this is what the 3:1 carbon to oxygen peaks are about. Graphene oxide, not pristine graphene. I agree that Rosalind did not extract a single sheet but x ray crystallography makes it possible to analyse the structure and like I said before, there were aperiodic imperfections that you cannot find anywhere else in nature and this is where the oxygen functional groups come into play to create the liquid crystal. The single layer has a thickness of 0.335 nm and they used that for the nucleotide, exactly 0.34 nm - please read the story.
the structure determination is in the crystallography works in the pdf from the work where rosalind analysed the single sheets of graphite that I would call graphene- just because thousands of studies about these liquid crystal graphene oxide layers in mesogens are also calling it like that, not only the single sheet itself but the layering of that nematic structure that stanninger found in the ear specimens as well- unfortunately she thought it was nanotech too, as in silicon like computation devices ... Pollack and Levin really opened my eyes ! And of course, finding the original idea for their double helix photo in chateau chambord !
So I will summarize : The GO Hydrogels are not the single atom thickness ideal as described in the 2004 psyop paper- they did this very likely on purpose... what Rosalind found is still the foundation for the structured graphene oxide hydrogels - what is meant by this are the graphetizing properties that are absolutely real and what drives these hydrogels. If the definition needs to be precise, we need to either change the definition, or the whole industry of real world hydrogels / crystals that are structured like that. And the thickness of these layers is 0.335 nm - the same measurement they took for the nucleotide- I hope this clears it up. To stop calling the GO crystals that would be a mistake, because the definition is wrong (on purpose, very likely)
It is important to distinguish between the several forms, because some are rigid, like in my guitar box - where it really helps to protect my instrument... the other form is crosslinking as a liquid crystal with metals and polymers / polyamides, as evidenced by the swiss research team in my links to the breakdown of the spectroscopy of what is in our body. It is the most hydrophilic and suitable material for ez water formation and this is why they have both spead horror stories about slicing our biology with it and complete denial (or that ridiculous 2004 story...).
It is organic, basically ... an allotrope of carbon- but even the swiss research team did not notice these very distinct carbon and oxygen peaks- Dr. Nagase did and now he is getting attacked for it...
Thanks Proton Magic, I cleared that up and looked again : The material used for GO is graphetizing carbon with 0.335 nm interlayer spacing, not 1 atom thickness lol (and sometimes non-graphetizing ones for more adsorption etc.... but they are probably using the graphetizing ones, because the oxydation is creating enough spaces for adsorption later). This was very fruitful and you are absolutely right, the 2004 definition is leading us astray with fictional mono-atomic non-sense! I gave you a shoutout in the article!
I think we have come to the same conclusions now, thanks for your efforts…but still I’m not really trusting Rosalind if being a Rothie is true…. well IDK.
I realized Qubit Fluormeters were not really measuring DNA but I didn't yet go the 9 yards to fully deny DNA. I did state that "The meaning of the yellow brick road in the Wizard of Oz was to help you find your soul’s way to illumination, the dark way of course." but didn't see the helix as the same kind of road.
The top of the stairway is the illumination, makes sense. Led Zeppelin were also deeply occult, the May Queen etc. are all about occult rituals. Much thanks.
When you listen to the audios I put in my articles - https://telestai.substack.com/p/kary-mullis-tripping-ballz - and elsewhere, it becomes evident that Crick and Watson had intense contempt for her and that she disagreed with their plan to introduce the double helix and molecular communication deception … in fact, she wrote that funeral note about the double helix because of her conscience (imho) and this is why they killed her later. “she blew it” (Crick)….
I can agree there is intrigue. My take would be that all of these folks had Intel handlers and they had to follow a script. Better to distract with conflict rather than have the world focus on the fraud of the structure. The never found bases by Kossel who still got a Nobel with no papers even ads to the multiplicity of smoke and mirrors that is only made real by the media, texts, professors, and fraudulent papers. Same as Covid fake virus. I can’t make absolute proofs on the people aspect.
The research was hidden for 75 years, then they invented the stupid story from manchester in 2004 with tape- lol!
It is important to grasp that virology is not just there to poison us or to make money. These people own the central banks. They don't need money, they create it when they want and orchestrate our reality like a hollywood movie! Nanoparticles are what make us sick, the fibers and particles in masks, the readings of snow peaks with 400x too much aluminium and the 3:1 carbon to oxygen peaks plus you can buy the dots directly from the thermofisher website and use them for bioimaging where they are common practice preclinical...
Their agenda has been running for thousands of years going all the way back to before the Pharaohs.
Their ONLY end goal has been to prevent the masses from knowing the truth about who and what we are. What we can do with our minds connected to our spiritual higher selves and what deep spiritual connection we all have to the higher realms of enlightenment.
The frequency modulations sever those links. As do the jab contents, and the medications the worlds population are addicted to! Even paracetamol (tylenol) dulls empathy responses!
Thank you for your untiring efforts to educate the masses.... I have cross posted and restacked.
Unfortunately we are all shadow banned so this information, along with a lot of what we share, is NOT reaching many...
This "across the board information sharing control" can't be kept up for much longer though, as things are beginning to crumble for them!
The truth about who and what we really are, and exactly what our bodies and minds are really capable of is finally leaking out... bit by bit! :)
Follow this Substack. 👇
https://factsoverfear.substack.com/p/7sees_-what-is-6g-and-the-ieee-w
That was quite awesome! You make the "science" that is out there now look like a guessing game, while You lay out the reality!
Thank You for Your work! May everyOne read this piece!
Your article reminds me of Mae-Wan Ho’s The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms. Long before today’s debates, she described organisms as liquid crystalline beings and coherent light emitters, with biological water playing a central role. What you write here echoes some of those pioneering insights from biophysics, even if approached from a different angle.
Thank for mentioning her work! I was going to write the same, but checking the comments first. Her work is wonderful for anyone who wants to delve deep into it.
You have a deeply unique and informative perspective I haven't seen elsewhere - keep it up!
please include the pdf download link of this important summary of yours, so people can have an accurate back up if the page is taken down
Thanks so much for this info. It seems to be supportive of my theory:
COVID = COmputational Viral Infectious Disease. The Dis-Ease is manifested by the exact mechanisms described here.
Also
Klaus Schwab foreshadows a digital pandemic…but I don’t think he’s talking about a computer virus. Or a logistical nightmare. I believe his Digital Plandemic will be “computationally directed assembly” of a disease -in real time, in vivo. And it will be directed by our cellular devices and accomplished via frequency modulation.
Anybody have any thoughts on this idea?
Thank you for your fascinating article.
There is always more to consider when one considers the design of the Biofield. It is as complex as our Universe.
At the very beginning of mitosis the field begins in sacred geometry i.e. the torus. Sacred geometry continues in our design at micro and macro levels. D.N.A is directed by a field before it becomes matter.
I feel it is plausible ThaT control system is a holographic Jing Luo foremost. The T.C.M Jing Luo is way more important in relation to how we form and to how we function. The 8 extraordinary meridians guide cell division from start to finish.
All the points you share are valid. Moving forward we now have more interactive discussion groups to advance Biofield theory.
As you know current physiology is describing a system ThaT is too slow. This is not the case. There are trillions of cellular interactions happening per second operating at room temperature superconductivity.
The Jing Luo Biofield manifested even before d.n.a & crystalline structured water. They are fully interactive with one another.
✨🙏❄️.
You state that: "Liquid Crystals are the 4th state of matter."
Plasma is also referred to as the 4th state of matter. Matter must have more than four states.
Is there a connection between charged liquid crystals and plasma?
Thank-you for your article from a fellow telestai who is aimed. ;-)
I just realised that the old gnostic tale from Sophia that became earth might be explaining plasma water (4th state of matter )... this fits perfectly to our discussion and it also makes sense in regards to Pollack's view about water and the origin of life. So water becomes a liquid crystal (4th state of water... they need to change it for matter so plasma becomes the 5th ;) ) when hit by light and the charge makes condensation possible, which might very well be the origin of life on earth: https://emmind.net/openpapers_repos/Endogenous_Fields-Mind/Water_EMF/Exclusion_Zones/2022_EZ_Water_and_the_Origin_of_Life.pdf
Water is so deeply fascinating, isn’t it? We have both had an ‘aha’ moment. I’m going to make a pot of tea and read the article. Thank-you for linking it.
p.s: so many memories are returning as I reflect upon your response from all the things JLL taught us over the years. ;-)
Ha well forget his rants about DNA because the double helix is pure fantasy.. Pollack describes how he almost understands that later on though :) ... Yes incredible ... I came through Dominique Guillet to John Lamb Lash ... a french whistleblower who translated 30 of his books into french... John told me once, that it cannot be conclusively said, wether it is a good idea or not, to follow the light tunnel that will appear at the moment of death (regarding archontic traps).... I was so glad that message got through ... thanks to Dominique !
I think it is better to call it 4th state of water ... thank you ....
Oh hello fellow Telestai,
it is great to have you around :)
Indeed- according to Pollack, there is a connection and that needs to be addressed ! But they are distinct ... so someone needs to make a decision here...
Fascinating! I look forward to reading the rest of your articles. 🙏🏼♥️
A lot of writers fall into the trap of using jargon and acronyms, thinking their readers know what they are talking about. For instance, what is ELF? You should probably explain your jargon when you use it. Otherwise - great read!
Thank you! Yes, you are right- I added the explanation! I
Keep up the great work.
“The Unveiling of the Magic Spell: Natural Law Versus Legal Law
How the Illusion of the Legal System Grants Immunity to the Powerful
The COVID era was a moment of stark revelation, a time when a "magic spell" was dramatically lifted. What many of us didn't fully appreciate before this was just how pervasive this magic spell truly was. We exist in a world where we constantly weave between two fundamental realities: one is natural law, and the other is legal law. These two systems may sound similar, but their applications and underlying principles are profoundly different. The key difference is that the legal system is essentially a sleight of hand, a "magical spell" designed to allow certain people to evade the consequences that natural law demands. The time has come to understand this fundamental duality and recognize the true nature of the system we live under.”
link:
https://prosepma.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?t=158
Little correction : I wrote 99% of molecular "weight" is water, but I meant the molecular count! If we would count every single water molecule, that would be 99% water - the volume is about 2/3 of our body of course! Cheers
Bravo Telestai. Excellent article. I placed it in France on my 3 platforms. Un abrazo! Xochi
Hi TN, do you have a paper proving the isolation and structure of graphene? The discovery paper says it is "hypothetical"
https://open.substack.com/pub/telestai/p/rosalind-franklin-discovered-graphene?r=10r0gt&utm_medium=ios
::: Addition for the readers : Thanks to Proton Magic I have updated the introduction about the Graphene part. He is right, our modern definition is wrong (surely with intention) especially graphetizing carbons are the basis for GO but they are not 1 atom thick, in fact, Rosalind found 0.335 nm spacing of layers, exactly the measure they used for nucleotides!
Yes. Rosalind Franklin discovered it. They did not have a name yet- in 1951 (the year of the invented "photograph 51" that they took inspired by chateau chambord in france) the link to her study is in the article! It is not hypothetical, they literally stole the measurement for the single sheet (0.34 nm / 0.335 nm) with its aperiodic imperfections for the invention of aperiodic genetic code! They gave the hypothetical nucleotide the same measure. That one is hypothetical ;-) Rosalind Franklin did not agree though. Her findings are used for crystallography of graphene and isolation too. They are lying to the public and cointel accounts that also perpetrate "fake space" and "fake cgi", just because google does that on purpose to get us into flat earth... at the same time these accounts were spreading fear against anti-oxidants like naturally extracted or fermented vitamin c and edta. It was vile, detoxing was basically generally rendered toxic, just because of the hijacking of the industry by the powers that shall not be etc.
I got the pristine form in my guitar box, it helped when a 4x4 drove over it once- that is the only place where I want to use it :-)
Thousands of studies that proof how they sneak it into our products: xochipelli.substack.com
Check my former articles for dozens of spectroscopy results.
Check the way it can be produced through jet combustion and additives, all background checked- last link from Dominique Guillet!
This is literally deeply entrenched in the double helix hoax.
Do you mean Franklin discovered graphene?. This is the “discovery” paper of graphene https://arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0410/0410550.pdf
ON PAGE 666, and the color image of the atoms of graphene has 6 sections.
They say it is hypothetical.
Spectroscopy finds elements in material not the structure. Where is it proven to be 1 atom and not just ultra thin grapite?
On DNA they had a very poor photo, of ??? and made math equations to get a dougle helix which seems like a leap of logic and the bases were supposedly found by Kossel but he never had any paper finding them.
Discovery was in 1951 - 666 is just our carbon nature, 6 electrons, 6 protons, 6 neutrons ;-) They are having fun with all these stories ... Agent is going the way of "fake space" - hinting at the cgi all over google.
The powers that shall not be are laughing their asses off and many of us believe their obfuscation. Of course space exists and there are beautiful constellations in the sky every night, totally congruent to ancient astrological models and temples / pyramid alignments!
Discovery of graphene in 1951? That requires 1 atom sheet as that is the definition. Just wondering if you have a paper proving this, seems not, which means we need to stop using the word graphene as an actual thing.
I see what you are saying. They made that single atom sheet definition on purpose - the thing is, GO hydrogels are a thing in the industry and if we stop using that term we don't know what we are describing but I agree that it is imprecise- but the whole story from 2004 was BS so let's just use the term graphene oxide for these layered and highly organized sheets! The material that rosalind found exists, it has a thickness of 0.335 nm and many layers are on top of each other and with oxygen functional groups it is a liquid crystal. We have the same problem with DNA - it was Nuclein, then they changed the definition to deoxyribonucleic acid and then again to the aperiodic code invention!
I think it is very similar to the EZ water that becomes structured ... they always derange the definitions, I agree - like they did with "DNA". When you say DNA does not exist, it is both wrong and right. The original definition as a liquid exists, but not as a molecule.
LC graphene exists in our body, but the single sheets are layered - not isolated in our body of course... the terminology is used for functioning wound dressing hydrogels- I mean 2020 we put that crap all over our body (the "desinfection gels" ... then they gave us the masks to get a reload, the 6 feet apart to read our biology ... it seems to be great fun!
In fact, I learned a great deal about their psychopathy by following everything they put out regarding graphene and it is a fun fact that the alleged spike proteins elemental composition fits 1:1 to a graphene qdot that can be bought from thermofisher for bioimaging (500 dollars a vial)... these are not liquid crystals though- these are colloids and they got a coating
there is a difference between graphetizing carbons and non-graphetizing - you can call that isolated layer graphene and in fact that word is now used and her methods are used for crystallography etc ... all in my article about franklin that I highly recommend
I am talking about graphetizing layers with 0.335 nm thickness, a well organized crosslinked structure- this is the same material that is used in the industry as LCGO (liquid crystal graphene oxide) hydrogels etc.
I agree that they defined it wrong in 2004- on purpose- the whole industry is using this term though, so should we change and obfuscate what we are talking about and call it precisely graphetizing graphite all the time ? It is better to call out the false definition...
This makes sense to me yes.
I am well aware of the bulldozing efforts from cointel that wants us to ignore metamaterials, metal contamination, interfacing materials- they want us to think about genocide or fraud- Latypova dismissed the content of the pfizer vials as contaminating crap... well I argue otherwise
I sent you her discovery paper twice. I said twice that they did not have a name for it yet but after lying initially, grok concurred and even the furious dr. hill needed to admit that she discovered it. Her methods are now standard. These sheets are layered, she measured them: 0.34 nm / 0.335 nm - the same they used for the invention of the nucleotide - THAT part is hypothetical :-)
0.34 nm is allegedly the "ladder spacing for the nucleotides" - so they simply stole it from the graphene discovery.
Appreciate your efforts, I don't see a link to a paper, sorry I can't go thru 144 pages, material discovery should be a short paper like this one:
This is the “discovery” paper of graphene https://arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0410/0410550.pdf
I don't see how they can sus-out a 1 atom thick material in '51 but not on '04 or even '25. Atoms are hypothetical anyway. I think we have both said our parts so lets call it a day!
The structure is shown in x ray crystallography and Rosalinds methods are still standard. She was surely not isolating these sheets yet, and we are not dealing with single sheets but liquid crystal forms of stacked GO that crosslink with metals and PVA for example - these are the hydrogels, basis for the fibers etc.
The manchester paper is the cover up for the masses ... 75 years of research and appliance was hidden from us !
Yes - please read my article about Franklin. This discovery is deeply connected to the invention of the double helix and my genetics article links to a book with 144 pages (search for that)- afterwards you are going to be convinced that the double helix does not exist :-)
Yes, I am saying the same, there is no double helix nor any DNA period.
But my q was on graphene, if it is hypothetical how and where is the proof of isolation and structure determination? Spect doesn't determine structure. If you don't have the proof that is ok of course.
The entire basis of the invention of aperiodic molecular code is based on the imperfections that Rosalind found on single sheets and this method for structural analysis is now standard. They did not have a name for it yet, as I mentioned earlier. It is not only not hypothetical, it has been the basis of the molecular distraction campaign and I also argue that virology is entirely there to hide the damage of metamaterials plus interfacing, namely dozens of metals and other particles that help interfacing us. They are shown in body scans all over the world and when I started to properly chelate, all joint pains disappeared and my whole system is working much clearer. I am deeply grateful that I did not fall for the disinfo campaigns around detoxing, namely the fear inducing strategy to point out synthetic contaminations while dismissing anti-oxidants like glutathione or ascorbic acid in general- that have a great effect against all the cationic inflammation
thank you for your writing. i have followed as much as i can for a while despite not being able to fully comprehend all the more technical info. i had come across gerard pollack's work before via other means but your integration of it here with other discovery has painted a much clearer picture for me to see. this article now has been a big help in my 'getting it'.
i have been put off trying any kind of use of possible chelating substances/supplements due to concerns about further toxicity.
i wonder if you would mind sharing fully exactly what you have found to work for you and how you have used such things?
or link where you have put this in a previous article that i might have missed?
The work for the structure was the crystallography and when you read my article about rosalind, you will see that they really found a different structure through specific heating and this type of liquid crystal is extremely useful for them and this is what the 3:1 carbon to oxygen peaks are about. Graphene oxide, not pristine graphene. I agree that Rosalind did not extract a single sheet but x ray crystallography makes it possible to analyse the structure and like I said before, there were aperiodic imperfections that you cannot find anywhere else in nature and this is where the oxygen functional groups come into play to create the liquid crystal. The single layer has a thickness of 0.335 nm and they used that for the nucleotide, exactly 0.34 nm - please read the story.
the structure determination is in the crystallography works in the pdf from the work where rosalind analysed the single sheets of graphite that I would call graphene- just because thousands of studies about these liquid crystal graphene oxide layers in mesogens are also calling it like that, not only the single sheet itself but the layering of that nematic structure that stanninger found in the ear specimens as well- unfortunately she thought it was nanotech too, as in silicon like computation devices ... Pollack and Levin really opened my eyes ! And of course, finding the original idea for their double helix photo in chateau chambord !
So I will summarize : The GO Hydrogels are not the single atom thickness ideal as described in the 2004 psyop paper- they did this very likely on purpose... what Rosalind found is still the foundation for the structured graphene oxide hydrogels - what is meant by this are the graphetizing properties that are absolutely real and what drives these hydrogels. If the definition needs to be precise, we need to either change the definition, or the whole industry of real world hydrogels / crystals that are structured like that. And the thickness of these layers is 0.335 nm - the same measurement they took for the nucleotide- I hope this clears it up. To stop calling the GO crystals that would be a mistake, because the definition is wrong (on purpose, very likely)
https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/extreme-danger-graphene-in-the-eyes?utm_source=post-banner&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true Dominique Guillet gathered hundreds / thousands of studies that clarify the psychopathy at work.
It is important to distinguish between the several forms, because some are rigid, like in my guitar box - where it really helps to protect my instrument... the other form is crosslinking as a liquid crystal with metals and polymers / polyamides, as evidenced by the swiss research team in my links to the breakdown of the spectroscopy of what is in our body. It is the most hydrophilic and suitable material for ez water formation and this is why they have both spead horror stories about slicing our biology with it and complete denial (or that ridiculous 2004 story...).
It is organic, basically ... an allotrope of carbon- but even the swiss research team did not notice these very distinct carbon and oxygen peaks- Dr. Nagase did and now he is getting attacked for it...
Thanks Proton Magic, I cleared that up and looked again : The material used for GO is graphetizing carbon with 0.335 nm interlayer spacing, not 1 atom thickness lol (and sometimes non-graphetizing ones for more adsorption etc.... but they are probably using the graphetizing ones, because the oxydation is creating enough spaces for adsorption later). This was very fruitful and you are absolutely right, the 2004 definition is leading us astray with fictional mono-atomic non-sense! I gave you a shoutout in the article!
I think we have come to the same conclusions now, thanks for your efforts…but still I’m not really trusting Rosalind if being a Rothie is true…. well IDK.
https://telestai.substack.com/p/the-stairway-to-heaven-of-the-chateau this was the link, sorry
I would be very suspect about claims that any one of these spooks are really dead. Most of them are just taken off stage. Even the Challenger Crew.
This was my post on DNA as the Wizard of Oz labout 1.5 yrs ago
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/is-dna-the-wizard-of-oz
I realized Qubit Fluormeters were not really measuring DNA but I didn't yet go the 9 yards to fully deny DNA. I did state that "The meaning of the yellow brick road in the Wizard of Oz was to help you find your soul’s way to illumination, the dark way of course." but didn't see the helix as the same kind of road.
The top of the stairway is the illumination, makes sense. Led Zeppelin were also deeply occult, the May Queen etc. are all about occult rituals. Much thanks.
When you listen to the audios I put in my articles - https://telestai.substack.com/p/kary-mullis-tripping-ballz - and elsewhere, it becomes evident that Crick and Watson had intense contempt for her and that she disagreed with their plan to introduce the double helix and molecular communication deception … in fact, she wrote that funeral note about the double helix because of her conscience (imho) and this is why they killed her later. “she blew it” (Crick)….
I can agree there is intrigue. My take would be that all of these folks had Intel handlers and they had to follow a script. Better to distract with conflict rather than have the world focus on the fraud of the structure. The never found bases by Kossel who still got a Nobel with no papers even ads to the multiplicity of smoke and mirrors that is only made real by the media, texts, professors, and fraudulent papers. Same as Covid fake virus. I can’t make absolute proofs on the people aspect.
https://telestai.substack.com/api/v1/file/1678cd6c-2bbd-43b7-8105-50265395e2cb.pdf direct link to the discovery paper from 1951, the year where crick and watson pushed that red herring narration around the double helix invention that Rosalind tried to resist!
The research was hidden for 75 years, then they invented the stupid story from manchester in 2004 with tape- lol!
It is important to grasp that virology is not just there to poison us or to make money. These people own the central banks. They don't need money, they create it when they want and orchestrate our reality like a hollywood movie! Nanoparticles are what make us sick, the fibers and particles in masks, the readings of snow peaks with 400x too much aluminium and the 3:1 carbon to oxygen peaks plus you can buy the dots directly from the thermofisher website and use them for bioimaging where they are common practice preclinical...
Their agenda has been running for thousands of years going all the way back to before the Pharaohs.
Their ONLY end goal has been to prevent the masses from knowing the truth about who and what we are. What we can do with our minds connected to our spiritual higher selves and what deep spiritual connection we all have to the higher realms of enlightenment.
The frequency modulations sever those links. As do the jab contents, and the medications the worlds population are addicted to! Even paracetamol (tylenol) dulls empathy responses!
There is so much to learn.... and indeed UNlearn!
🤔 when you say liquid. Our bones are piezoelectric thats not a liquid. Definitely crystal though ♾️🙏🏼
You state that: "Liquid Crystals are the 4th state of matter."
Plasma is also referred to as the 4th state of matter. Matter must have more than four states.
Is there a connection between charged liquid crystals and plasma? ;-)