46 Comments
User's avatar
SIRIUS's avatar

This seems cool! But as far as I am concerned, since such research does not include the divine essence of the spirit, without which physical life as we know it would be impossible, all the conclusions will be missing a key factor and thusly fall "a bit" short.

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

Well the charge based approach would actually be opening the portal to this! The matters of the spirit can only truly be dealt with internally and through intersubjective confirmations. This is how the buddhists and gnostics operated. I am currently also investigating this viewpoint, nothing is settled- but Jamie Andrews studies are very interesting and really worth to follow at this point !

Expand full comment
SIRIUS's avatar

Thanks for your sensible comment.

I hope that such paths in scientific research lead towards accepting the divine presence in humanity among the scientifically minded!

Have a nice day

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

There are certainly some very ‘dubious’ people involved in this research which is a major reason why I withdrew from it. It’s hard to steer the unfolding of research. Anyone can pounce on it .

Expand full comment
SIRIUS's avatar

I agree. As long as scientific research is tied to usury system of "money" and the only type of science which is allowed by the parasitic powers in charge it will only get worse!

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

Yup. I dont want to give them any more fuel to use against the public , basically. Even socialism or communism would use these things against us, sadly. this is why so much spiritual exploration has gone underground for so long.

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

Ah yes, I had a quote in there that is actually not aligned with my view that biology is indeed the expression of the wisdom of nature which is sophia, from philosophy, the love of wisdom - so these traditional views are actually confirmed by irreducible complexity. I find it personally fascinating that zero point energy science is actually confirming a realm like source or the ground too, others would call it heaven - a field where all information from space time can be reduced to a 2D - a ground, it can be experienced and the wormholes of the einstein-rose bridges, of near death experiences and dmt experiences align as well and seem gateways and it is assumed that microtubuli in our brain connect to these spaces, where hyperspace is experienced. I made a metastudy about it : https://telestai.substack.com/p/dmt-and-near-death-experiences-ai?utm_source=activity_item

Expand full comment
SIRIUS's avatar

Well - that is precisely where I see an issue with such attempts. I do not agree with the nature of any modern "scientism" and obvious "reducing" what is already known about the spirit, aether, astral and divine to a "dry" scientific abstract (unreachable) concept. It is done only so that it can be patented and that parasites of this world can get rich on it! If such application of human science does not STOP, humanity stands no chance and will eventually be a soul-less spirit-less tagged micro-chipped neuralinked cattle. Already there are way too many zombified drones that live like empty shelled slaves thanks to usury-money which drives 99.99% of ALLOWED science. It is quite a damn evil situation if you ask me.

Expand full comment
Esme N's avatar

they know exactly what they are doing. this guy is in the forefront of their efforts:

https://youtu.be/YAtQFkEg5-w

there's another by the name of James Giordano here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02SK9yd60s

notice how the disease spikes in 2020 were in areas around 5G activation. this was the tool used to get enough traction for the new virus narrative that led to the jabs, introducing god knows what technology into as many a possible in order to carry out a system upgrade to interface with the digital control system rollout.

yes, particles of dna, rna, strands etc are a red herring no doubt because it is all about frequncy and vibration and the psychopaths clearly have developed ways to develop that into weapons for destruction in so many ways. 5G towers being one case in point.

Expand full comment
Rel@xMore's avatar

I think we will discover in due time that DNA is not at all what we are being told, if it even exists; and that "the ones" who tampered with humanity are probably the same ones who "taught Science" to deny the Biofield as a legitimate human body part. The lies are unraveling fast thanks to the hard work of Jamie and others...

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

I do ponder the moneyed psychopaths inbreeding. They must be aiming at retaining something in the lineage... And it seems it would be psychopathy. I'm not saying it's "genetic," but ask what defines Their aims if not "genetics?"

Very interesting stuff, and yes, Jamie is a solid hero!

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

Yes there must be a charge based imprint, possibly from the zero point energy field, that explains telepathy, connection to the dead and so on ...

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Could be indeed. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

IF Jamie is right, this would be too quick to say now !

Expand full comment
David's avatar

Maybe it’s because they aren’t human, maybe it’s something to do with reincarnating into their offspring. So many different perspectives.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Could be... Indeed, so many possibilities

Expand full comment
TC's avatar
Mar 28Edited

To keep the wealth in the family and avoid karma

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Keeping wealth in the family is just a matter of passing it on to heirs... And the "karma" thing is why They "tell" Us Their plans. They think that They can avoid that but unless They tell Us Ethically - i.e., in clear and certain terms, fully and completely, in the vernacular We use - the karma will land on Them.

Expand full comment
Dan Whiting's avatar

Fascinating!

Expand full comment
Esme N's avatar

great piece by the way, thank you.

Expand full comment
Zyz's avatar

I dont think ive ever heard the argument that genetics isnt real before - needless to say im intrigued!!! I'm curious what your thoughts are on the chemical structure of DNA? There have very meticulous models of the atomic components of DNA - are these all faked? It feels strange to dismiss an entire area of study like this, especially when ive seen plenty of images of DNA in a cell, made from tagging their chemical signatures. I like to keep an open mind tho so pls let me know!!

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

I have started off with the same reaction, while going through all the science. But since I realised the powers of A.I. and their advantage in that, they can totally create a coherent world like the viral genome databases for covid variants, where the size was contradictory etc. I truly recommend reading Jamie Andrews series around DNA, where he decomposes the PCR test meticulously and finds tremendous inconsistencies and illogical steps that falsify the narrative. 90 control studies around virology disproved the paradigm too... allegedly, parts of bacteriophargues, non living viruses with alleged genomes, are needed for DNA scripting in vivo.... https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/the-dna-hoax-0a2

Expand full comment
Zyz's avatar

Could you please explain some specific proof to me?? I skimmed through the link (admittedly i didnt read any of the stuff with A.I., since i dont trust A.I. to have accurate information) and most of his arguments seem to be that our DNA tests and technology are useless - honestly, no surprise there. But I feel that just because our tests don't work doesn't prove genetics is fake

I found it interesting that he mentioned nucleotides are chemicals "held together by hypothetic electromagnetic forces", since as far as im aware all chemical substances (and atoms themselves) are held together by hypothetical electrical forces. Could you please explain any actual specific proof that this stuff isn't real? Sorry if im misunderstanding, im just so confused - thank you for your time!!!

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

https://vsuis.foroactivo.com/t1349-on-the-dna-hoax There are some answers for you as to how the fluid DNA was turned into the mythical molecule, a great magic trick

Expand full comment
Zyz's avatar

Thank you!! An interesting read for sure. I knew that Rosalind Franklin photographed DNA before Crick and Watson published their theory, but I always heard it is because they stole her ideas and published them before she wrote her own thesis!! I guess it's impossible to know. The connection of the double helix to the occult is some food for thought

I love the idea of an electrome, but i think it actually works better WITH the concept of DNA. DNA codes for proteins and ion channels by specifying their amino acids (since ion channels are made of amino acids) -> these proteins and ion channels control the flow of electricity. Where do new proteins come from if DNA doesn't exist to encode them? It still makes more sense to me that both exist together.

The idea that they "turned" the DNA fluid into a molecule is strange to me - aren't ALL fluids made of molecules? Either way, thank you for the resources!

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

Thanks for reminding me to clarify this somehow in the text - DNA does exist, just not as GENES

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

I would not worry so much about the "occult"- mainly because of this : https://bibliotecapleyades.net/mistic/mistic_38.htm

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

DNA does exist and there seems to be the antenna in the nucleus in the form of chromosomes - but they have no genes like they say (this is as far as I have got so far) - it is in the updated text, all the explanations - also a new microscopy photo and links to other material

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

Well this is literally why I wrote the article, all the arguments are in there and if you read his work closely- it all becomes much less confusing. I needed a few days to process it all, go through forensics, the inconsistencies with ancestry that is only using the hidden big data magic and when you really go into the details of how electrophoresis allegedly works and when you realise that without the PCR sequencing, there is no way to read these alleged codes ... then it becomes clearer and clearer - I am not at 100% but I have realised so much around viruses that it becomes much easier to understand. The electrome can explain everything simpler and better!

Expand full comment
Dan Roach's avatar

Pervasive scientific fraud has finally been brought to the fore - ironic, as we watch the elite deceit take family and friends in millennia-old plans to cull the pesky humans. The illusion of lego life-control is seen to be ending. No more immutable blocks locking us in. We seem to be getting closer to the primordial dynamic fields - I say it’s about time.

Expand full comment
Rhys Jaggar's avatar

As someone who spent a decade working every day with DNA, I feel obliged to correct a few of your statements.

1. 'DNA is a white fluid'. On the contrary, a liquid DNA sample is colourless. I've redissolved several thousand samples of DNA precipitated out of solution and on no occasion was the DNA-containing liquid anything other than colourless. Semen may be coloured white, that is not pure DNA.

2. What IS white is DNA precipitated out of aqueous solution using alcohol (be that ethyl alcohol or isopropanol). If we are talking chromosomal DNA from animal cells, it is visible to the eye, whereas if it is low molecular weight DNA, you only see it as a white pellet after spinning it to the bottom of a tube using a bench centrifuge.

3. If you say that DNA does not exist you must come up with explanations as to why enzymes exist that can cut DNA very precisely and that DNA molecules are actually characterised by the patterns that digestion with such enzymes create on gels which separate DNA molecules on the basis of size. I have done thousands of restriction enzyme digestion reactions personally and they are repeatable by anyone from Nobel Prize winners to wet-behind-the-ears fresh graduate students.

4. You must also come up with explanations as to how DNA sequencing was developed if DNA does not exist.

5. You must further explain how scientists created the ability to produce specific proteins to order in biomanufacturing protocols, when their methods involved transferring DNA molecules into host cells which would then transcribe and translate the code within the DNA which orders the production of that protein. If of course DNA does not exist...

Let us also be clear: epigenetic phenomena do not invalidate genetics, they bring flexibility and context. Just as nature and nurture act in concert in shaping personalities.

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

I am sure that the Illumina has been designed with very refined thoughts behind the countless priming and input variables to get what we are looking for. The background checking has been done by Jamie Andrews, I have to refer you to him, since he is the person that has spent years with 20+ years experienced geneticists and virologists to falsify the paradigm

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

The Sample might be colourless- but we are talking the chemicals that have been used to allege that the molecule was formed from them!

The explanation is the Electrome, Ion Channel Communication through fields and intelligence over trillions of cells (Sally Adee) it is an expansion of the notions of epigenetics and it explains everything flawlessly - especially in addition to what we know from zero point energy science that went into black projects like bioelectricity!

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

This has always fascinated me. All my life I’ve been able to see what you might call ‘kundalini’. Its as clear as day to me and seems to be very similar in form to the supposed DNA spiral. It is clearly an important, replicable experience, tweakable even. I’ve discussed it with many eminent academics who are very keen but a bit frightened to openly discuss it. I’m sure these things are well understood at high levels. I’m hardly unique.

Expand full comment
Jessica's avatar

Before coming to this article I was questioning the whole free radical and antioxidant jargon... it seams that that theory turned out to be quite profitable but really doesn't hold water in the true sense of science. Now I see this information and it shakes the foundation of life as we knew it. But they've lied to us about pretty much everything so it doesn't even surprise me anymore

Expand full comment
Mikhail's avatar

Levin's research seems like it's a continuation of Robert Becker's ( orthopedic surgeon) work. Becker was the author of The Body Electric (1985) and several other works. Recommended reading.

Expand full comment
Damon Bunce's avatar

It is, Dr Tom Cowan sums this up nicely.

Expand full comment
enigmatic proprietary's avatar

Electricity is only 2% of our makeup.

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

How do you weight electricity? With it comes gravity and electrogravitics - a connection from the aether https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of

Expand full comment
enigmatic proprietary's avatar

Its not about weight.. and yes, it's all connected.

Expand full comment
Telestai Nexus's avatar

Well I was just curious how you arrived at this number :) what do you mean then ?

Expand full comment
enigmatic proprietary's avatar

It means electricity is a tiny component to our makeup. It means people think we can integrate with electricity when we cannot without deformations. There is too much clinging on that we are only matter. Not going to say anything about that %. It is what it is.

Expand full comment
Reality's avatar

Most of our sciences have been maliciously placed on a dead end path. Material and computer science are the exceptions.

Expand full comment