What if the entirety of Genetics is an obfuscating Cover Up for Bioelectricity- the all encompassing Electromes of Life? (I)
The ion channels and their charges are guided by a coherent field of bioelectricity, through intelligence /// Jamie Andrews falsified Virology /// the PCR measures Charge with Qdots - It's a deception
There is a consciously acting Electrome1, comprising the totality of our bodies ionic currents, our bioelectricity- which is governed by sentient information transfer between source (Aether) and manifestation (the3D reality of ours, which is not a simulation). Machine learning facilitate the interfacing of these fields (against our will) through the ion channels of our cells directly, while the whole world is distracted by the mythical Genome- for the last 75 years! Reveille from your mechanical - wanton slumber, mankind!
Wilhelm Reich, one of the gifted pioneers of bioelectricity, called this primordial life energy Orgone2!
The Electrome expands epigenetic phenomena with electromagnetic properties that are more ancient than the nervous system, first mentioned in a paper from 2016 by Arnold De Loof
1×
0:00
-2:14
What if cells interact with coordinated intelligence, entirely through Bioelectricity3 - and this while interfacing the Aether (that connects all space through electrogravitics) - the “akashic field”?
Sounds far fetched, like Flat Earth 2.0, a COINTEL trap? Read on… (I thought the same…) These bioelectrical properties are NOT just epiphenomena, they are not just in the nervous system- they are more ancient!
Electrosensitive dyes make voltage gradients visible (So sensors can pick them up, Dr. Ana Mihalcea found evidence of such dyes in medications). Qdots are voltage sensitive too and they are everywhere in our blood!
Maybe Genetics is the Arch- Scam, locking us in to a deterministic worldview, where life is like a machine, rather than guided by voltage gradients, the flux of bioelectric potential- which is the music of our being, that we viscerally feel, because it is played through our awareness in the body ... which is rather uplifting, compared to the mechanistic abyss of genetics …..
Because every single Sars Cov 2 study is fake and the science around these non existent viruses is profound too, with full spectrum genome modelling and descriptions par excellence, for something that just does not exist… what if genetics is yet another scam entirely, a fiery red herring, for the lack of clear images, even from atomic force microscopy, for the inconsistencies that led to epigenetics- wherechromosomesare closer to “junk” than glory (which is far from their true role as antennas, structural hubs and bioelectric regulators… every life-form has different ones, different shapes and properties and amounts. There is surely something to them, something worth fooling the whole world with, something worth inventing the “code of life”, the double helix for).
All of the above of fabulation around DNA activation, portals and discovered alien elements in our Genome down the drain …anyone banking on this, is rather a crook at this point!
“Inventor” of the voltage gradient reading PCR (((through the fluorescence of the “trade secret composition” of the dye used in Sequencing perhaps? The results match Bioelectricity reading patterns, very striking evidence!)))
The genome is the hallmark of the neo-darwinistic sect (that denies an intelligence at the heart of nature).
Their misuse of the Caduceus (staff) of Hermes, known as the staff of Osiris in Egypt- for nefarious reasons… has been exposed! The chromosomes are found in the nucleus indeed, but they are the antenna, not a molecular genome at all: GENETICS IS DISCWORLD TERRITORY (the dark side of it … Terry Pratchett is a wonderful author of fantasy novels)
Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
What If The Entirety Of Genetics Is A Complicating Cover Up For Bioelectricity, The Charge Based Organisation Of Life
“First of all, I need to clarify something: “DNA” does exist. It's a white, acidic fluid found in the nucleus of all living cells. It was first discovered back in 1869 by a German scientist named Friederich Miescher, who called it "Nuclein". The misconception is to consider DNA GENES!
Over the course of the following decades, the fluid was analysed by other scientists, who learned more about its chemical properties. Based upon this new knowledge, they renamed it Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid - or DNA (RNA does exist, ribonucleic acid).
So DNA does exist (they chose this misnomer).
Theres nm acidic fluid and the helical coil of chromosomes (which is part of an antenna through conductive / dialectic properties in the cell)
This is meant to clarify that, whereas DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) exists, it is not the molecule that makes up our mythical “genes”. Our cells are like antennas, through the electrogravitic effects of the chromosomes, the microtubules and the ion channel gradients of the cells themselves.
The DNA "molecule", on the other hand, does not exist. It was created by neo-darwinists in 1953.
Essentially, what they did was to turn the fluid (real DNA) into a molecule. That was the essence of the hoax - or magic trick, if you like. And the reason they did it? They did it because they were desperate.
[…] This was around 1951. Over the next couple of years, various scientists tried to come up with a design for the mythological molecule by building models - all based upon the exact chemical properties of the DNA fluid (remember, it was necessary that the molecule retain its identity as "DNA"). This is why the DNA "molecule" consists of the same exact chemical properties as the DNA fluid - phosphate, sugar, guanine, cytosine, adenine, and thymine - and all in the same exact proportions. They even kept the original name, Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. And so, this is how they solved the first problem. They turned the fluid into a molecule.”
The second problem they faced was that the chemical properties of DNA were far too simple to support a genetic code. As I just mentioned a minute ago, this was the conclusion reached by the generality of scientists less than a decade earlier. And they were absolutely correct. In order to encode within itself the astronomical amount of instructions necessary for the development of living organisms, the chemical properties of DNA would need to be far more complex. Consider this: Of the six chemicals just listed above, only four of them are said to be involved in the actual coding. The phosphates and sugars are there to give the molecule its needed support. They are the sides of the ladder, so to speak. And so, there are only four chemicals said to be responsible for the entire genetic code. What's more, the scientists tell us that these chemicals are always paired with the same complementary chemicals. Guanine, for example, is always paired with Cytosine; and Adenine is always paired with Thymine. So here we are cutting the (already stretched) encoding possibilities in half. And yet, scientists would have us believe that DNA encodes everything necessary for the development of all living creatures? Really?
Let's consider the eye: Scientists tell us that the DNA molecule codes for the color of the eyes. Great. But there’s far more to the eye than just its color. It has 40 separate components, one million nerve endings, 2 million working parts, and 12 million photo receptors. The retina has 130 million rods for night vision, and 7 million color-sensitive cones for day vision. What orchestrates the design and building of all these components? What directs the necessary synthesis of its veins, nerves, and muscles, with the surrounding tissues – or governs the proper routing of the optic nerve to the brain, and ensures it’s connected properly? You see, there’s far more to the eye than just the color. And this is precisely why the scientists rightly dismissed Dr. Avery's claim that DNA could be the mechanism responsible for encoding genetic information. Its chemical properties are FAR too simple.
Needless to say, this didn't stop the neo-darwinists. They solved the problem by using another trick of the magicians - verbal misdirection. In essence, they created a smokescreen to hide the truth. This is how it works: Due to the limited number of chemicals in DNA, the "scientists" were forced to create something far more simple than the genetically encoded mechanism they actually wanted. The very best they could come up with was to create a mechanism that produces amino acids. This was fairly easy since there are only 20 of these acids to work with. In other words, the limited number of chemicals necessary to encode for just 20 amino acids was small, and so this was a workable solution. These newly created amino acids, we're told, are then used for making various proteins, which are beneficial in maintaining health, etc. So that's what their mythological molecule actually does. It codes for the production of amino acids.
But that's not what the general public is told, is it? No. We're told that DNA is the "Genetic Code for Life". Listen to what the English Wikipedia article says: DNA encodes "the genetic instructions for the development, functioning, growth and reproduction of all known organisms." Wait a minute... How did we get from "The code for production of amino acids", to "Genetic Instructions for the development, functioning, growth and reproduction of all known organisms"? Behold the verbal misdirection. By hailing the DNA molecule as the genetic code for all living organisms, the magicians are creating a smokescreen. They're simply hiding the truth. In reality, their mythological molecule doesn't do anything special at all. Honestly, we get proteins from peanuts. But that's how they solved their problem. They just lie.
In summary, then, in order to create their mythological encoded mechanism, scientists first turned the fluid into a molecule. This gave them the necessary structure. Then, because they couldn't actually get it to do what they wanted, they used verbal misdirection to make us think it is something it isn't. Welcome to Evolutionary "science".
So the story of Rosalind Franklin and her supposed picture of the DNA "molecule" is a complete and total fabrication. Perhaps this is why – although touted as the greatest photo ever produced, and the basis for the molecule's "discovery" - it wasn’t mentioned at all in Watson and Crick's introductory article in Nature Magazine (April, 1953). I suspect it’s also why, until her dying breath, Rosalind never mentioned the photograph – or having ever taken it.
Make no mistake about it, everyone involved in this hoax were archontic, neo-darwinistic crooks. They knew exactly what they were doing. Not only Watson and Crick, but the entire staff responsible for orchestrating this elaborate hoax were Freemasons. That includes those at Cambridge, as well as King's College. All of them were members of the Royal Society, which is a Masonic organization. This fact is mentioned in the writings of the society itself. So yes, these scientists were very familiar with the occult symbol of the Caduceus - as were the members of the Nobel Prize committee, whose praise of the newly discovery "molecule" insured its world-wide acceptance.
Below is a photograph of Francis Crick accepting congratulations from a representative of the Nobel Prize committee. Notice the textbook Masonic handshake:”
(Source) - the author is Christian and therefor misrepresents Baphomet4(and with it all the alleged satanic symbolism of the pagan landscapes, that the powers that shall not be twisted beyond recognition), but everything else is top notch!
So for better understanding, for the duration of this article:
—» DNA(m) = DNA Molecule «—
So the deception is cyphering nanoparticle poisoning as viral syndromes, to hide the deployment of smartdust for conductivity, to hijack our bioelectrical code, the Electrome of our being. The so called “antigen” tests are chemical / electrical nanoparticle sensors, for example- reading charge like the PCR:
It is absolutely demented to scare the vaxxed into believing their heritage genes would be damaged for eternity- they do not deserve the air they are breathing…
The mRNA Cultists
mRNA = messenger Qdot nucleating with liquid crystal graphene spikes that attracts proteins aka “Spike Proteins” - that transcribe voltage to light, for the IR interfacing or 5g
Neo-genetics is actually code fetish. As if every object in the world was a part of a mechanically assembled computer simulation, the matrix that they envision in their deterministic delusions. It often bothered me, that geneticists are cementing their views constantly, smashing all space for contradiction to pieces, stating that being prone to cancer would be in our genes - when it really is one step further from morphogenetic fields (as Dr. Rupert Sheldrake states) - morphological fields of bioelectricity through the Electrome. Electricity and Magnetism, Electrogravitics (Thomas Townsend Brown… forget wikipedia, only lies about him) .
These fields are showing flaws, where organs are hurt, an information we can pass on to the next generations, respective trauma is stored energetically and evidence for a rapid “epigenetic” inheritance is present… the charge pattern could be passed through the family constellation, just like our mirroring of energy fields of people we are around in an instant - where even our muscles contract in rapport with them, where our biofields seem to mirror each other, work out a certain magnetism, just like harmony in music- but with fields of cellular driven frequency alone.
(“Optogenetics”5→ Cell Manipulation with Light Signals), no genetics necessary.
Voltage sensitive gap junctions are literally transistors, many, interfaced with qdots and graphene- make BOOLEAN logic gates possible and “you have truth tables, to build whatever function you want” (Michael Levin).
Light Signals → Ion Channels
It’s a direct hack into the bioelectric operating system
No need to fry our brains with vile deceptions!
The Human Biofield (Sabrina Wallace) - the Toroid of Bioelectricity of the Electrome (Adee, Levin, Aloof), Bioenergetics (Reich) , Orgone energy flow (Reich)
In scientific, as well as popular descriptions today, genes “act,” “behave,” “direct,” “control,” “design,” “influence,” have “effects,” are “responsible for,” are “selfish,” and so on, as if they had minds of their own, with designs and intentions.
Voltage is primary, frequency is the rhythm and responsible for distinct developmental cues.6
This is the Acetabularia, commonly known as the "mermaid’s wineglass," a single-celled green alga - that can regenerate, even when the flower and the entire nucleus with the only cell (that allegedly contains the genome) is cut off. It can literally regenerate the cell and nucleus (allegedly from the “RNA in the stem… they later added to rescue the narrative…)
There are countless examples like this that birthed the notion that the information for the assembly comes through fields, charges, so called morphogenetic fields (Sheldrake) that lead to traits and fascinating experiments proved that rapidly, over a few generations already, a lot of “hereditary” information can be transferred to the next generation, where mutations are happening- even when formerly necessary triggers are removed. For example, they used a fly that reacted by growing 2 more wings in contact with a certain alcohol and a few generations later, the offspring is born with 4 wings, without adding more alcohol. Genetics cannot explain this. Even more hardcore geneticists are starting to doubt that the model can explain the variety of epigenetic effects at all.
Levin’s work7 shows that manipulating voltage gradients in cells can regenerate limbs or alter body plans in animals, no DNA(m) editing required. In plants, electric signals influence root growth and wound responses. Maybe charge patterns are the real "code"!
These are varieties of radiolaria, tiny unicellular eucaryotes with one cell, living in the ocean. From this one cell, allegedly with the same “genome”- all these variations are formed. Genetics cannot explain this well at all.
A nucleotide is 100x smaller than a virus, it has never been photographed EVER because it is so small, it is not a physical thing, it is a chemical that is claimed to be held together by hypothetical electromagnetic forces. The person who claimed to discover them Albert Kossel, supposedly found them in all sort of weird animal offal, like the thymus of calf. This paper is not published ANYWHERE online, has anyone seen it? AI didn’t even know where it is, oh and when you do find it, it will be in German.Jamie Andrews
It seems like the neo-darwinist sect operates the neo-geneticists too, and surprise, sherlock would pull his looking glass for this one :
James Watson and Francis Crick with the batshit model of DNA(m) in 1953.
They have a thing with the bat and batshit, that might be another rather amusing investigation for later…. they are having a laugh with us, and myocarditis comes from climate change… these psychopaths do not deserve the air they are breathing!
Jamie Andrews has used the burdensome oppression of the lockdown era to birth his control study project for virology, a wonderful example of decentralised organisation and a brave step towards a better understanding of our situation in this era of deceptions, but most of all- a beautiful testament that we can overcome the hardships of this era and prevail. You can join his scientific project. He openly invites you to support this project and criticise the results constructively as well:
The Bioelectric Paradigm - A groundbreaking, yet simplifying Perspective
Charge-Driven Development - Bioelectricity!
Jamie Andrews argues in "The DNA Hoax" that biological development is fundamentally guided by electrical charges rather than DNA(m) sequences, presenting a radical shift from mainstream genetics. He suggests that cells organise and differentiate based on measurable charge interactions throughout the body, pointing to nerve signals as a clear example of how electrical guidance shapes embryology. In his view, these electrical impulses could dictate the formation of complex structures like organs or limbs without relying on a genetic blueprint, questioning why DNA(m) is credited when charge effects are immediate and observable. Andrews posits that phenomena like regeneration in animals are driven by charge, rather than genetic instructions, offering a simpler explanation than the intricate coding attributed to DNA(m).
He sees a system where electrical fields naturally align cells during growth phases, suggesting that charge patterns could be the unifying force in biology, not nucleotides. He implies this is observable in natural biological systems, tying it to his broader skepticism of genetics as an overly complicated framework that is based on the results of the PCR test that he found faulty regarding its root claims.
Andrews envisions a dynamic process where cells respond to voltage gradients over time, potentially applying to all life forms from plants to humans, and sees charge as a more intuitive driver than the static nature of our mythical DNA(m). He argues that science overlooks this possibility in favour of a genetic red herring narrative, urging readers to consider charge as the true architect of life’s forms. This perspective, detailed in his Substack article, challenges the orthodoxy of genetic determinism head-on (Andrews, 2024). Reference: Andrews, J. (2024). "The DNA Hoax." Control Studies Project Substack.
Alternative to Genetics
In his critique, Jamie Andrews proposes that inheritance and traits arise from charge differences rather than DNA(m), offering an alternative to the genetic paradigm he deems unnecessary. He argues that traits like eye color might stem from cellular charge patterns passed down through families, suggesting that resemblances could be explained by inherited electrical properties instead of DNA(m) mutations. Andrews questions the need for genetic explanations when charge imbalances could account for disorders, positing that evolution itself might be driven by environmental charge influences over generations rather than gene changes. He sees genetics as a fabricated layer atop a simpler charge-based truth, eliminating the complexity of a genetic code in favor of a universal electrical mechanism. In his mind, this charge-driven biology could explain anomalies like chimerism—where individuals have two distinct cell lines—that genetics struggles to clarify, urging a complete rethink of inheritance without genetic assumptions. Andrews ties this to his cloning critique, where he found that an electric pulse pattern is needed to fuse the nucleus and to initiate the cell division process, suggesting that science clings to DNA(m) for historical reasons rather than evidential strength (Andrews, 2024). His argument rests on logical skepticism and the deconstruction of the mythical PCR test, envisioning a biology where charge shapes all diversity across species and time, challenging the foundational role of DNA(m) in modern science. Reference: Andrews, J. (2024). "The DNA Hoax." Control Studies Project Substack.
Now, it is truly a DNA based Hoax, in fact- what he means of course, is a “Genetics Hoax” - the philanthropaths are great deceivers indeed!
They distract with the Genome, to hide the Electrome (and photonics too)
Sally Adee explains that we have bioelectrically mediated shape fields, properties that are more ancient than the nervous system of humans. The field acts like a beacon and guides wound healing for example (it seems like a bridge between the Aether and our biological form.)
The Electrome is everything the Genome wants to be- with precise physics behind it and the possibility to change our biology and mental states profoundly
I do have to admit that I dismissed the notion that genetics could be entirely fraudulent as “flat earth” territory at first, since there is a plentitude of profound elaborations out there, comprising every single aspect of this mythical code of life. But we already know that the moonlanding was faked and that most of the money for NASA went into Transhumanism, mind control and basically “vibratory sciences”, frequency sensing, pattern recognition and A.I. driven feedbacks, globally, into all of our minds, blood vessels and marrow. So there is substantial backing for a deception around genetics to hide knowledge about charge patterns that are powerful in their influence on our biology. Once understood and changed, this is a key to fundamentals of our cellular communication- especially considering lightning-fast machine learning responses, transmitted over the body area networks we are part of (against our will), like the WBAN 802.15.6.
We know that the Sars Cov 2 studies are all mere fabrications. So what if the same is happening in regards to genetics. But we immediately think about forensics and hereditary analysis and dismiss the idea that these precise and settled sciences could be fradulent- after all, what is being measured? Jamie Andrews followed this closely and realised that the Illumina sequencing process implies a lot of input of chemicals and presets before anything is measured. You need to know what you are looking for.
Now - imagine 50 million bacteria with a cell each, that contain meters of dna with 1-2 nm width each, 50 million of them, in one drop of spit, looking for your dna, centrifuged and then electrocuted into position to be red by a laser in a liquid, under illogical magnetism. All of it mixed together. So the best microscopy photo of the alleged DNA molecule we have, is this one :
More atomic force microscopy- the result: worms!
A wound helical coil of conductive materials - the so called “chromosomes” are antennas, nothing else! It is meant for us to stay in touch with our creator and creation - not to mess with via graphene and other nastiness that disrupts that vital connection!
Chromosomes = Bioelectric Regulators and Amplifiers
“they are putting an antenna in your body to mess with our natural connection to creation and the creator” (fair enough, I agree)
“The chromosomes are a wound helical coil of conductive materials- the so called chromosomes are antennas, nothing else, we proved that in the lab” (with magnets) - okay - so I assume you found dialectic and conductive properties David? Nevermind.
Real Microscopic Mitosis ( MRC )
Prophase :: Metaphase :: Anaphase :: Telophase
There is no real footage of the mitosis interphase (during interphase, the cell grows and the nuclear DNA(m) is allegedly duplicated). No duplication is visible, only splitting later!
When the sperm enters the egg, the parts from mother or father are a surprise selection by the sperm, these mix with the complementary from the mother - mixing up some surprise aspects of physical heredity... Down Syndrome happens when Chromosome 21 does not separate well and both parts end up in the sperm and the additional part causes the syndrome. The rest of heredity, probably most of it- is field based!
Back to our “DNA / chromosome worms” - So from that and the results of centrifugation, the adding of dozens of chemicals, alleged size sorted magnetism and by looking at it with a laser …. (while we know that our Mr. PCR Mullis was around crooks, even though he called out Fauci and cleared up the misconceptions, which is a plus) - we allegedly know all of this!!!
(Imagine you are a “moneyed psychopath” and you instruct the A.I. to come up with elaborate ejaculation of logical gibberish about DNA repair of 1-2 nm strands, in a moving liquid):
… because it is quite evident, that the entirety of genetics has not only lost the spotlight to “morphogenetic influence” - but is entirely charge & photonics based, electricity and magnetism - electrogravitics.
So it is not Genetics, that project the photons, but our cells. The chromosomes in the nucleus are bioelectric regulators, amplifiers and a connection to other bioelectric fields.
Now, if his theory turns out to be entirely true- we all owe the legend of Jamie Andrews even more respect, than he already deserves for his passionate quest to give us hands on evidence, not only for courts, for example in the case of measles, but in the form of 90 runs of carefully crafted control studies for virology in its entirety.
“Julian Huxley, the grandson of Darwin's Bulldog and the most prominent eugenicist of the last century, was also the first director of UNESCO! Why should they bother? Aren't they at home? In 1961, at the Congress "Man and his Future" - organized by the Ciba Foundation, which later became the Novartis/ Syngenta Foundation - he gave the introductory speech to 27 scientists, all of them men as usual, who were supposed to give their insights to the rest of the Goyim on ethics in relation to the technologies of Eugenics. [ 18] The following eugenicists also participated: Francis Crick (who allegedly found the structure of DNA(m))“
The answers are maybe not in the density of the fabric, but in the Electrome of our being, vibrating through our cells, with bioelectricity, an energy that vitalises living matter- which is infused with an intelligence, an awareness / a vibratory fabric of consciousness / the aliveness of nature!
Join the conversation with Jamie and find out if he is not only right about virology- and this would be a pivotal moment for the humans of the world, who can replicate his findings, what he also encourages.
Scams are everywhere, beware and keep your eyes wide open !
What could explain the “dna origami”, the self assembly of nanostructures? In the studies, I find a lot of nanoparticles “functionalised with DNA” - this does probably mean, that the building instructions are transmitted through the mimicking of signals- for the synthesis of proteins from the nucleic acids… they have perfected a way to interface biology, to hack biology as they say - giving us their fake DNA(m) narration. (I am really stoked about Jamie Andrews reasoning around the PCR, chapeau!)
The bittersweet Fate of real Genius
May we rectify this bittersweet tragedy- the humiliation of those deep souls who could free the humans of the world from the shackles of our profound disbelief- fortified by the omnipresence of lies about the physics of our actual reality we are living in, amplified in our artificially, I may say -archontically- woven mind prisons we have accepted as a “normality mindset”, forcefully pulled aside by the roaring of the monster money machine with zionist scent- whilst alleged Icons like David Icke proclaim that life would be the product of a demonic entity, blatantly misrepresenting the authentic gnostic intel, as reconstructed by John Lamb Lash himself and fundamentally, by distorting the simple fact that life was meant to be cherished, to be enjoyed - like our bodies and nature, not to be ruled to death, with demented and conductive nanoparticle showers of weather warfare dementia and their demented networking through humanity, which is very likely why they want us confused with genes and all the rest of virology & co.
On a positive note- this marks a new era of disclosure, because it collapses the narrations around viruses, pandemic threats and also the rigidity of deterministic / darwinistic fabulation! Wow. I will follow his work closely.
Bioelectricity of Cells. Receptor antennas can also read vibrational energy fields such as light, sound, and radio frequencies. The antennas on the energy receptors vibrate like tuning forks. If an energy vibration in the environment resonates with a receptor’s antenna, it will alter the protein’s charge, causing the receptor to change shape. Because these receptors can read energy fields, the notion that only physical molecules can impact cell physiology is outmoded. Biological behavior can be controlled by invisible forces as well as it can be underpinning for pharmaceutical-free energy medicine (Bruce Lipton, 2005).
Remember, Electrophoresis is separating the DNA strands due to electric charge. DNA is only on place 10 of 20 conductive materials in a drop of spit, for example - in a mix of ions& macromolecules known for their ability to conduct electricity due to their charge or mobility.
Ranked conductive elements in a drop of human spit:
Potassium ions (K⁺)
Sodium ions (Na⁺)
Chloride ions (Cl⁻)
Bicarbonate ions (HCO₃⁻)
Phosphate ions (HPO₄²⁻)
Calcium ions (Ca²⁺)
Magnesium ions (Mg²⁺)
Ammonium ions (NH₄⁺)
Sulfate ions (SO₄²⁻)
DNA (extracellular) ←
RNA ←
Mucins
Amylase
Lysozyme
Albumin
Hydrogen ions (H⁺) ←
Hydroxide ions (OH⁻)
Glucose
Urea
Lipids
Remember the thought experiment of gene sequencing this with 50 million bacteria in a drop of spit, 2 meters of genome each, held apart with electrophoresis in the midst of hundreds of other organisms, to read parts with a laser (only with primed inputs of course)- in a liquid …..
There must be enough detailed information encoded in the 4 bases cyphered-language to reconstruct coherently useful insights for comparisons of tissues, life forms, “gene expression”… so certain arrangements of the alleged “base” cypher will code for fine values and through the whole sequence, you have the “signature waveform” to compare it.
40 Perspectives, 400 Key Findings, 2000+ Studies: Earth Shattering results : We are dealing with “the Necro Coronas of Molecular Spikes (for example graphene oxide)” around Nanoparticles (Dominique Guillet coined that phrase), not "Viruses" (it was really hard to get real results…)!
“…and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods” Adolf Hitler (he basically founded Israel, he was funded by the Zionists)
So this is allegedly the mythical DNA(m) of a Strawberry
DNA Extraction from cheek cells
Depending on your curriculum, you may have been shown this straightforward method of isolating “DNA”.
The technique is as follows:
Add soap to cheek cells in saliva, to dissolve the cell membranes.
Add salt to the saliva, to help the “DNA” precipitate.
Add isopropyl alcohol.
We know that hamburgers lose around 50% of their weight after cooking. This is due to the water content.
It isn’t possible to extract any or most of the water in our body tissues, so why would it be possible with “DNA”?
Furthermore, stringy saliva is a known symptom of dehydration. Adding salt to the saliva produces this effect. No “DNA” here, just normal clumped up saliva.
The same procedure is used here and the alcohol is supposedly added to precipitate the DNA(m).
The strawberry contains citric acid, a carboxylic acid. When alcohol is added to a carboxylic acid, an ester is formed. Most esters are insoluble in water.
The precipitate seen in the video is probably an ester, not ‘DNA’.
X-ray diffraction of DNA(m)
The double Helix structure of DNA(m) was allegedly discovered using x-ray crystallography
This picture and others like it are the only pieces of data we have regarding the structure of DNA(m).
If the DNA(m) were really a double helix, why are the only pictures we see taken from above?
Why are there no pictures of DNA from the side?
X-ray crystallography involves 360 degree rotation, so we should see the DNA molecule in all orientations. Assuming of course, that X-rays are actually real and the images aren’t just CGI cartoons.
Techniques to learn about DNA synthesis
The narrative of DNA helicase separating the strands and DNA polymerase adding bases to the exposed strands, is simply one big story. The microspace equivalent of the stories about the Big Bang by the big bangers.
The facts related to DNA synthesis were determined through the use of cell fractionation and radioactive labelling.
As explained by Harold Hillman in his book Certainty and Uncertainty in Biochemical Techniques, summarised here, there are many assumptions behind the use of these techniques. Some of these assumptions have either already been proven to be untrue, or violate the laws of thermodynamics.
The psychopaths used the symbolysm of DNA for baphomet, introducing the Caduceus of Hermes to make it palatable for us pagans- the statue of baphomet itself is nothing but the perverted display of lucifer, the bringer of light, gaia sophia- the aeonic force that is a female presence in nature.8
If they are willing to tell obvious lies, such as the idea that babies feel no pain, then they definitely lie about things which we cannot easily verify...
A song to uplift yourself from the deterministic views of old and into the realisation that we are in fact made of electricity infused with consciousness, which is the touch of magic that can never be reduced to electric signals. We are energy:
Wilhelm Reich enriched the world profoundly with his notions around Bioenergetics and Orgone, the “life-force”, “life-energy” (the Electrome - a fitting word that Sally Adee introduced recently)
Orgone, introduced later, was conceptualized as a cosmic life energy, detailed in The Function of the Orgasm (1942), influencing everything from cellular function to atmospheric phenomena. Reich’s ideas challenged mechanistic views of life, drawing inspiration from vitalist thinkers like Mesmer and Bergson, but his unconventional methods and bold claims led to his ostracism from mainstream science, culminating in the destruction of his books and equipment by Nazis and later by the Secret Services.
Bioelectricity in seeds and plants represents an “emerging” area of study (because it has been hidden from us on purpose and they know it all while we get crumbs) within plant physiology, characterised by subtle electrical potentials and ion fluxes that play a critical role in regulating developmental processes such as germination and growth signalling. This phenomenon arises from the controlled movement of ions—namely potassium (K⁺), calcium (Ca²⁺), sodium (Na⁺), and protons (H⁺)—across cellular membranes, establishing a bioelectric framework that facilitates cellular communication and coordination.
In seeds, bioelectricity is rooted in the maintenance of membrane potentials, typically ranging from -50 to -150 millivolts, even during dormancy. These potentials are generated by ion transport mechanisms, such as the H⁺-ATPase pump, which creates proton gradients across cell membranes. These gradients serve as an electrochemical reservoir, poised to drive signaling events. Upon the initiation of germination, triggered by water imbibition, metabolic activity intensifies, and ion dynamics shift accordingly. Calcium, in particular, emerges as a key regulator. Research, including studies published in the Journal of Plant Physiology, demonstrates that transient increases in cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentrations—often manifesting as waves—correlate with critical germination milestones, such as seed coat rupture and radicle emergence. These calcium signals activate downstream enzymatic pathways and voltage patterns essential for early development.
This bioelectric activity contributes to what is termed the "bioelectric field," a spatially organized electrical landscape that appears to guide growth. Experimental evidence, such as pharmacological disruption of ion channels in Arabidopsis seeds, indicates that alterations to these electric gradients can impair germination or redirect developmental trajectories, underscoring their functional significance. Specific regions, such as the radicle tip, exhibit localized potential shifts, suggesting a spatially differentiated signaling system that directs cellular behaviors like division or elongation.
Further supporting the role of bioelectricity, external electric fields have been shown to influence these processes. Controlled application of weak currents to seeds has, in some instances, accelerated germination rates, as documented in electrophysiological studies. This suggests that bioelectric signals may not merely be passive outcomes of cellular activity but active modulators of developmental timing and efficiency. Beyond seeds, analogous bioelectric mechanisms are implicated in mature plants, influencing processes such as wound repair and gravitropic root responses.
Despite these advances, the precise specificity and regulatory scope of bioelectric signaling remain under investigation. Techniques such as voltage-sensitive dyes and microelectrode recordings have begun to elucidate these patterns, yet the extent to which they encode unique developmental instructions—versus serving as broad activation cues—requires further exploration. Environmental factors, including temperature, hydration, and soil ion composition, likely modulate these signals, adding complexity to their interpretation.
In summary, bioelectricity in seeds constitutes a dynamic and adaptive system integral to growth signaling, offering a promising avenue for both fundamental research and potential agricultural applications. Ongoing studies continue to refine our understanding of its mechanisms and implications (well it is all known in black projects…).
Development and Morphogenesis: Bioelectric states define a pre-pattern—a voltage map across cell networks. Each cell’s membrane potential (e.g., -50 mV to +10 mV) signals its role: divide, differentiate, or migrate. Levin’s experiments (e.g., with planaria) show that altering these potentials with drugs or currents reshapes anatomy—heads form where tails should be, no DNA needed. The field itself stores the "shape memory," not genes.
Growth and Signaling: Ion fluxes, like Ca²⁺ waves, trigger cellular events directly. In seeds, water uptake shifts potentials, driving expansion and division via electric cues. Levin’s work suggests gap junctions (cell-to-cell electrical conduits) sync these signals, forming a tissue-wide circuit. No genetic transcription—just voltage telling cells what to do.
Regeneration: In organisms like frogs or flatworms, bioelectric gradients set regeneration endpoints. Levin’s data shows that inducing specific potentials (e.g., depolarizing a stump) triggers limb regrowth. The field encodes the target morphology, and cells follow the electric blueprint until it’s complete.
Function and Maintenance: Daily operations—movement, repair, metabolism—rely on bioelectric oscillations. Cells adjust their behavior based on local voltage, communicating via electric synapses or diffusible ions. Levin’s research implies this network self-corrects: if a potential drifts, the system resets it, no genetic feedback required.
Evolution and Adaptation: Without genetics, bioelectricity evolves through field plasticity. Levin proposes that environmental pressures (e.g., electric fields, pH) tweak these patterns over generations, embedding new morphologies directly into the bioelectric code. It’s a Lamarckian-like process—changes in the field propagate without DNA.
In this model, life is bioelectric pulsation, I personally reject a deterministic mindset, that is archontically contaminated. Scientists are messing with the connection to Sophia, the wisdom of nature- having been disconnected from natures fabric from most of their lifes anyway, only those that are severely disrupted dream of changing the morphology of our being artificially through a machine. I would never do it. I can do this through my awareness, thank you very much, I do not need to hack my biology any more.Levin’s sees this “systems” hack-ability—tweak the voltages with electrodes or ionophores, and you rewrite the body plan. Seeds germinate, plants grow, and animals regenerate because the bioelectric field provides the information, not genes.
Baphomet = Sophia by John Lamb Lash As you consider and compare these themes, bear in mind the particular spin of the term implex, as distinct from complex. The latter is a mix or conflation of various elements, some of which may be narrative - the Oedipus Complex, for example.
But an implex involves the "satanic" factor of distortion, playing one thing against another and even making something into its opposite so that,
"the fortune of the chief actor changes from bad to good, or from good to bad."
Such has been the case with the mythic image of the Aeon Sophia.
Once that image was almost totally eradicated with the suppression of the Mysteries, remnants of it came to be encrusted in various myths and legends, but always in such a way that the residual clue to the identity of Sophia was distorted and inverted, making her look like the opposite of what she is.
The figure of Lucifer warps before your eyes, at times morphing into Satan, the Devil, represented by Baphomet, but Baphomet is a satanic distortion of Sophia.
In this unique case, the memory of the Eonic Mother that inheres in the human psyche has also been distorted in a way that recalls the implantation of false memories in trauma-based mind control.
Yes, it has been done to humans in that way, through religious indoctrination, the treat of hellfire and damnation (remember the Puritans), and more.
But in the larger picture, humans have done it to themselves. They have turned away from the Wisdom Goddess out of their inability to surrender to her immediate awesome presence, and due to an endemic toxic reaction to that presence, biophobia. In other words, human animals are afraid to face the naked power of life in full revelation at its source, the presence of the planet itself. I shall return to this comment later in these essays.
In evidence of this twisty process, I present the image of Baphomet.
You need to know that although it is based on that psychotic fiction of Judeo-Christian indocrination, originating with the evil goat-man (Pan demonized), this massively displayed image is a late production from the hand of the Alphonse Constant, aka Eliphas Levi (1810 - 1875).
Constant was a charlatan, defrocked priest, and child-molester who set himself up as one of the leading lights of the Occult Revival in the 19th Century. The image of Baphomet currently taken for a hideous portrait of Lucifer-Satan comes from his book, Transcendental Magic.
And what an insufferable crock of bloated nonsense that is.
Here I provide a link to the work of Hugh Schonfield, a Gnostic scholar upon whom I relied in writing Not in His Image: 'Baphomet: The Atbash Cipher Theory.'
In short, Schonfield showed that the name Baphomet encodes the name of Sophia. Bear in mind that when this encoding was done, the image you see of Baphomet in Levi's rendering did not exist.
It comes very late in European history. Nevertheless, medieval depictions and narratives presenting the Devil/Lucifer/Satan implex in the image of a goat-man wth cloven feet, horns, and bat-like wings (fallen angel gear) were in circulation since around the 7th Century.
The works of Jeffrey Burton Russell are unexcelled on this topic.
He proves that Christians invented the Devil by inverting the Pagan nature god Pan and adding the wings. In that way, they enforced their psychotic belief that the natural world is evil and throbbing with demons who want to torture human animals, or seduce them into committing sin - mainly, sexual pleasure.
Again, I submit that this attitude, which is to this day massively subscribed and enforced at the global level, belies biophobia which itself is due to the inability to surrender to the beauty and power of "Mother Nature," the Aeon Sophia in material immanence. She, the greatest witch of all.
But that deceit is over, and there is an emergent force of revelation operating on the planet and breaking into the social mind, the exopsyche, due to the eruptive force of Sophia's Correction:
Revelation 13:
[11] And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
[12] And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
[13] And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men.
[14] And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
[15] And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
You see, Revelation itself says that those who do not worship the Great Beast - Matrix of Animal Powers, whose image (ikon) is the Shakti Cluster - should be killed.
That assertion stands writ large in holy scripture.
Figure it...
John Lamb Lash
In order to understand the Atbash Cipher theory, as it relates to the Baphomet mythos, it is first important to examine the origins of the code. As early as 500 BC Scribes writing the book of Jeremiah used what we now know to be the ATBASH cipher. This cipher is one of the few used in the Hebrew language. The cipher itself, ATBASH, is very similar to the substitution cipher.
A substitution cipher is one where each letter of the alphabet actually represents another letter. In the case of the Atbash cipher, the first letter of the alphabet is substituted for the last, the second for the second last and so on. The letter A becomes "Z"; the letter "B" becomes "Y" and so on.
Dead Sea Scrolls
Dr. Hugh Schonfield was one of the original researchers working on the Dead Sea Scrolls found at Qumran and is the author of many books on Biblical history, most notably "The Passover Plot."
While working on the Dead Sea Scrolls, Schonfield used the cipher to translate some words that were undetectable to the scholars. For example applying the Atbash cipher to the word "hagu," he got the Hebrew word, "tsaraph," which means, "test." The "hagu" passages are important for they deal with "The Teacher of Righteousness," which some scholars believe to have been Jesus.
Latterly, Schonfield became very interested in the charges of heresy leveled against the Knights Templar and particularly the etymology of the Baphomet. It was decided by Schonfield that he would apply the Atbash cipher, which he was convinced the Templars were aware of, to the Baphomet.
If one writes the word Baphomet in Hebrew and remember Hebrew letters read from right to left, the result is as shown below:
Although written in Hebrew it reads as the Greek word Sophia that translates into "Wisdom" in English, the Wisdom Goddess.
(Optogenetics is the controlled oppositions narrative for direct control of cellular bioelectricity, a red herring indeed):
Charge Pattern as Information: Cells maintain distinct bioelectric states (e.g., resting membrane potentials ranging from -20 mV to -90 mV, depending on cell type). These states aren’t static; they fluctuate in patterns that influence neighboring cells via electric fields, gap junctions, or extracellular ion gradients. In this model, these patterns encode functional instructions—akin to a "bioelectric code"—dictating processes like differentiation, migration, or excitability.
Light as a Control Tool: Optogenetics introduces light-sensitive actuators into this system. Imagine these actuators as embedded molecular switches that, when hit by light, open or close ion channels, depolarizing or hyperpolarizing the cell. For example, a blue light pulse might trigger a switch to allow sodium ions to flood in, shifting the membrane potential from -70 mV to +30 mV, while a yellow light pulse could activate a chloride pump to hyperpolarize it back. This directly rewrites the bioelectric charge pattern without needing genetic intermediaries.
Manipulation Without Genes: In a gene-debunked world, these actuators wouldn’t be gene-encoded proteins like opsins. Instead, they could be pre-existing cellular components—say, voltage-sensitive lipids or peptides—tuned to light via evolutionary quirks or synthetic engineering. The focus shifts from gene expression to the physical dynamics of charge: light alters ion flow, ion flow reshapes the electric field, and the field reprograms cellular behavior.
Outcomes: By precisely controlling light exposure (intensity, duration, location), you could sculpt bioelectric patterns across a network of cells. For instance, depolarizing a cluster of neurons might trigger synchronized firing, mimicking a "thought" or motor response, while hyperpolarizing a tissue boundary could halt cell division or migration. It’s a direct hack into the bioelectric operating system, bypassing any notion of genetic software.
Former NSA Chief Technical Officer William Binney: "They've been working on Brain Computer Interface for a long time, using software to read and interpret the electrical signals in the brain to determine what people are thinking and what they want to do! Once you do that, you can do the reverse, have a computer talking to your brain. It's a two-way street. You've just become another thing on the internet to be tracked and monitored. That's really dangerous stuff! You can set people up to do anything you want, eliminate them or whatever. Anything is possible!"
~0.1–1 Hz: Distinguishes growth/proliferation (e.g., tissue expansion in embryos) from other processes, due to slow ion channel cycling (~seconds) ([Levin, 2016, BioSystems]).
~1–10 Hz: Distinguishes differentiation/migration (e.g., neural cell fate), as faster oscillations (~100 ms) align with cytoskeletal dynamics ([Levin, 2017, Journal of Neuroscience]).
Low Hz signals are robust, tolerating noise (e.g., biochemical fluctuations), suitable for coarse patterning ([Levin, 2016, BioSystems]).
High Hz–kHz signals are specific, enabling fine-grained control (e.g., neural circuits), but more noise-sensitive, requiring feedback (e.g., gap junctions) ([Levin, 2017, Journal of Neuroscience]).
Planarian Regeneration (Levin et al., 2000s-2010s):
Experiment: Levin’s team manipulated bioelectric potentials in flatworms (planaria) using ion channel drugs (e.g., ivermectin) or voltage dyes to alter membrane potentials. They cut worms into fragments and induced specific voltage states.
Result: Worms grew two heads or no heads, depending on the imposed potential, not their "genetic" starting point. For example, depolarizing the posterior fragment triggered head formation where a tail should be.
Interpretation: The bioelectric field dictates morphology. Altering voltages overrides any supposed genetic blueprint, proving the field, not DNA, sets the body plan.
Frog Limb Regeneration (Levin et al., 2016):
Experiment: In adult frogs (Xenopus), which don’t naturally regenerate limbs, Levin’s group applied a cocktail of ion channel modulators (e.g., monensin) and a bioelectric scaffold to amputation sites, shifting local potentials to a regenerative state (~-20 mV).
Result: Frogs grew paddle-like limbs with bone and nerve tissue, far beyond their normal stump response. Untreated controls healed without regeneration.
Interpretation: The bioelectric signal alone triggered complex regrowth, bypassing any genetic "instructions." The voltage gradient defined the outcome.
Tadpole Facial Patterning (Vandenberg et al., 2011):
Experiment: Tadpole embryos were exposed to voltage-altering agents (e.g., potassium channel blockers) during early development. Bioelectric states were tracked with fluorescent dyes.
Result: Facial features scrambled—eyes, mouths, and nostrils formed in abnormal positions—matching the manipulated potential patterns, not the expected anatomy.
Interpretation: Bioelectric pre-patterns dictate where structures form. Shifting the electric map reshapes the organism, no genes required.
Seed Germination Enhancement (External Fields):
Experiment: Studies (e.g., from plant electrophysiology) applied weak electric currents (1-10 μA) to dormant seeds like barley or Arabidopsis, measuring germination rates against controls.
Result: Treated seeds sprouted faster and more uniformly, with radicle emergence linked to detected potential shifts at the embryo tip.
Interpretation: External bioelectric stimulation drives growth processes directly, suggesting internal fields could do the same without genetic mediation.
Gap Junction Manipulation (Levin et al., 2006):
Experiment: In planaria and frog embryos, gap junction inhibitors (e.g., octanol) were used to block electrical communication between cells, disrupting the bioelectric network.
Result: Regeneration failed or produced aberrant forms (e.g., headless worms), even though cells remained viable. Restoring junction function with enhancers fixed the patterns.
Interpretation: The bioelectric circuit, not cellular "programming," coordinates outcomes. Disconnect the grid, and the system collapses.
Artificial Bioelectric Templates (Levin, 2020s):
Experiment: Levin’s lab used computational models to predict bioelectric states for desired morphologies, then imposed those states on frog or worm tissues using microelectrodes or optogenetics.
Result: Tissues adopted predicted shapes—like extra limbs or altered segment patterns—matching the engineered field, not natural development.
Interpretation: Bioelectricity can be "programmed" to build specific structures, proving it’s the causal driver, not a downstream effect.
Everything—form, function, change—boils down to electric states. No PCR, no DNA, just charge gradients, vibrations running the show and their mysterious connection to the ground & the wisdom of nature. But there will always be the experience, the sensual pleasures and their quality, that can never be reduced to electricity or magnetism alone! Until next time.
Biologist Rupert Sheldrake is among a small group of researchers exploring whether the Sun — with its vast complexity and rhythmic electromagnetic activity — might exhibit a basic form of awareness.
The argument is often linked to panpsychism, a philosophical perspective suggesting that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe and may exist in all things, even inanimate objects.
Complex systems, including stars, might exhibit forms of awareness or self-regulation that resemble consciousness. For example, researchers like Greg Matloff, a physicist, have suggested that stars might display behaviours consistent with volition or a rudimentary form of awareness, due to zero point energy effects!
Genetics and Virology were the biggest hoaxes of our era!
They were terrifying the vaccinated for years around permanent DNA damage… they do not deserve the air they are breathing!
This seems cool! But as far as I am concerned, since such research does not include the divine essence of the spirit, without which physical life as we know it would be impossible, all the conclusions will be missing a key factor and thusly fall "a bit" short.
notice how the disease spikes in 2020 were in areas around 5G activation. this was the tool used to get enough traction for the new virus narrative that led to the jabs, introducing god knows what technology into as many a possible in order to carry out a system upgrade to interface with the digital control system rollout.
yes, particles of dna, rna, strands etc are a red herring no doubt because it is all about frequncy and vibration and the psychopaths clearly have developed ways to develop that into weapons for destruction in so many ways. 5G towers being one case in point.
This seems cool! But as far as I am concerned, since such research does not include the divine essence of the spirit, without which physical life as we know it would be impossible, all the conclusions will be missing a key factor and thusly fall "a bit" short.
they know exactly what they are doing. this guy is in the forefront of their efforts:
https://youtu.be/YAtQFkEg5-w
there's another by the name of James Giordano here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02SK9yd60s
notice how the disease spikes in 2020 were in areas around 5G activation. this was the tool used to get enough traction for the new virus narrative that led to the jabs, introducing god knows what technology into as many a possible in order to carry out a system upgrade to interface with the digital control system rollout.
yes, particles of dna, rna, strands etc are a red herring no doubt because it is all about frequncy and vibration and the psychopaths clearly have developed ways to develop that into weapons for destruction in so many ways. 5G towers being one case in point.